Home

Latest Website Update: 25/05/23

( Bookings and OnOurOwn sections)

Please use the menu above to find your way around our website. There is News in this Home section; all details of current, future and past bookings on three Bookings pages; reports on shows we see without the Group on three OnOurOwn pages; your comments on shows you see in YourComments; links to other useful websites in the Links section; and AboutUs is all about us. The Contact section is one way of contacting us.

READ reviews by the theatreguys and Group friends by clicking on the titles – The Motive and the Cue / Jules and Jim / Dancing at Lughnasa / Ain’t Too Proud / Guys & Dolls / Innocence / Blue / Private Lives / Shirley Valentine / Further Than The Furthest Thing / A Couple of Swells / Marjorie Prime

NEWS

07/05/23 Fredo writes –

Potent Music

“Plays aren’t always about nice people,” commented Stephen Mangan, in the Director’s Forum on PRIVATE LIVES. He was with his fellow-actors Laura Carmichael and Sargon Yelda, with director Michael Longhurst and the Donmar’s Literary Manager Craig Gilbert, and the audience were discussing the volatile relationship of the central couple, Elyot and Amanda.

This was the second viewing for Mike and me. We were delighted that the majority of our group had enjoyed it at its final preview, and it was interesting to see how, two weeks later, the performances seemed to have gained confidence and the characterisation had deepened. 

It’s a play we had seen in different productions many times before. It’s often – indeed, almost always – played as a brittle comedy, with the actors placing one familiar line after another to get the expected laugh. Michael’s staging had taken the critics and some audience members by surprise: his Elyot and Amanda were hurt, defensive people, torn between extremes of passions, and sliding into combat at moments of provocation.

Neither Michael nor Stephen had seen or read the play before, and Michael had been immediately struck by its visceral passion, and by the violence, telling us “It’s in the script!”. The script has not been changed for this production – Amanda. reminiscing, says “That was the first time you hit me!”. They agreed that the domestic violence cannot be funny, must be portrayed truthfully, but once it’s released on stage, how do you recover?  Stephen said that he and Rachael Stirling had delved into their characters and noted how they behaved liked children. 

During rehearsals, the cast had discussions with a relationship therapist to help them understand the interactions between them. They concluded that the four characters were all needy and narcissistic and packed with contradictions – even Sibyl and Victor are revealed to possess primal emotions under their well-mannered veneer. It’s important to recognise that all four give as good as they get, as equal partners.

This familiar play carries a weight of expectation. Michael said that their is a danger that the music of the language, if delivered in the conventional clipped tone of many Coward productions, can disguise the strong feelings that are underneath.

Stephen was at pains to emphasise that the play is set in a different time to ours with different values; they’ve survived a world war, a flu pandemic and more punitive divorce laws. This lends Elyot and Amanda a feeling of abandonment, and a wish to live for the day.

Michael drew attention to Hildegard Becthler’s designs. The colour palette of the production was based on sepia-tinted photographs of the period (note the detail in Sibyl’s costume in the last act). He added that visiting Hildegard’s home is like visiting a palace; every chair is a masterpiece.

A visitor from New Yorker commented that this was the most entertaining play he had ever seen – but how taxing is it for the actors? Stephen had pulled a pectoral muscle in rehearsal, and laughingly complained that Rachael had bitten lumps out of his arm. And he was pleased that he had caught the olive that she throws to him in his mouth 14 times out of 20 (so far).

In the first act act, Amanda weeps softly on hearing a love song that she and Elyot had shared. “Strange how potent cheap music is,” she comments, to cover up her tears. And like the song, the play is potent – but never cheap. 


09/04/23 Mike writes –

How well behaved are you?

It all began with an article in the Guardian by a front-of-house theatre worker complaining about the behaviour of some audience members. Then other newspapers ran with it too. It seems audience behaviour in theatres has deteriorated since Covid and the lockdown. Observations suggest audiences for ‘jukebox musicals’ are the worst. And it’s drunken women who cause the most disturbance, hen parties who have been drinking before they arrive at the theatre then continue to party during the show. We have seen it happen and now it’s happening more often. Sometimes there are male fisticuffs too. Apparently theatre staff have been accosted and spat at, and audience members have been instructed to leave.

Having just seen Shirley Valentine, I can report that each seat has a QR code on the back for anyone to order “Champagne”, nothing less. And as Shirley sips wine continually, it must be tempting to follow her example. Audiences may want to toast an appealing performance and a revival of a well-writen play, but not during the show. We better keep a caring eye on you! 

Noisy boxes of Maltesers used to be the bane of the Stalls, now its sealed packets of sweets, impossible to open quietly, if at all. And have you noticed those who want to have their phones on continually, to check regularly during the performance. Better they stayed at home – the screen-light is distracting for everyone, including those on stage.

Let’s turn the clock back a few years. At one time we were not allowed to take glasses of wine into the auditorium unless it was transferred to a plastic beaker. That has now changed. We must cut back on the use of plastic, so now glasses can be taken into a show provided the alcohol is bought in the theatre bar. At a recent performance of the grim James Norton ‘male-nudity/self-harm’ play, glasses of white wine were being consumed everywhere. A stronger beverage would have been understandable. Also, a few years ago, some theatres began to give their audiences a menu for ordering food and drink on their phones, from the bar, for delivery to their seats. Oh dear, that was asking for trouble. Since lockdown, that mad idea seems to have been curtailed, or was the Shirley champagne going to be delivered to the phone-owner’s seat? Shurely not!

Is audience behaviour getting worse since Covid? Prices have gone up, for sure. Does payment buy entitlement….to behave badly? Some people may want to bring their own refreshments to avoid bar prices, but theatres don’t allow alcohol to be brought into the building. We often complain about bag-checks delaying us as we enter but staff are now checking, not for bombs but for illicit drinks being smuggled in. Some bring in smelly take-aways too. A while back, one of our Group was stopped taking a can of pick-me-up G&T into a theatre, so she drank it on the spot – better inside than out! But with all the checks happening now, how are illicit treats smuggled in? We hear of feminine wiles. I’m sure men must have wiles too. Remember that bar takings are an important part of a theatre’s effort to cover it’s costs.

Is there really a show-type that encourages audience disturbances? We once had three cheerful young women sitting behind us at Dirty Dancing who joined in the songs and insisted on leaning over our shoulders to tell us what happens next – of course they had seen the show and film many times and were there to have fun once more. An attendant remonstrated with them and eventually they left of their own accord. Their sense of fun had evaporated or perhaps they needed a gender neutral loo. Staff hate working on this show because of troublesome audience members. This happened BC, Before Covid, so it happens more frequently now. On a more recent occasion, four middle-aged women arrived tipsy to see Grease, talked noisily throughout the first half, retired to the bar in the Interval, staggered back to their seats….and were ordered to leave the theatre before the second half began. A relief all round. But maybe a symbol of ‘a good time’ for them.

Putting the wine aside, why water bottles? I cannot understand why some have to sip throughout a show “to keep hydrated”. Surly they can sit still without a swig for just one Act of anything. Water bottles are allowed, so I guess some replace Highland Spring with Smirnoff.

In New York, Off Off Broadway, there’s an immersive theatre experience called Drunk Shakespeare. Yes, it’s a Shakespeare show where you can drink, the actors can drink, and everyone can join Macbeth at the hostelry for a rowdy romp with inebriated actors. Yes, really! It’s so popular it’s being franchised around the US. Whatever happens in America happens here next.

In fact it’s happening already. This summer the Leicester Square Theatre hosts Sh!t-faced Shakespeare: Much Ado About Nothing, which (and I quote) “is an adult show for big sensible grownups and therefore contains rude stuff!”. “A bucket load of booze” is promised so maybe there’s an excuse for rudery. And currently at the Arts Theatre there’s The Choir of Man – “Music, mates and good times…offering you a pint down at the best pub in the world. Book for the ultimate night out” they say. Encourage that audience to a theatre and they expect to behave the same way at other theatres – there’s no excuse for drunken behaviour at legit shows, musical or not.

A new production hits the West End in May – “Idiots Assemble; Spitting Image the Musical” with its cast of pupets. The tag line is “Like a big West End Show but without the boring bits”. Is that what today’s audience wants? And with a bar.

Arifa Akbar, the theatre critic, writing in the Guardian last month (here’s a LINK) suggests that complaints about audience behaviour could be just “class snobbery and cultural elitism” – theatre is a collective experience, and we should accept behaviour different from our own. She says “theatre is a group activity and there will always be other people’s noise in any collective space.” She adds “As someone of South Asian heritage, I know that encouraging interjections from the audience is welcomed by performers during poetry readings in Pakistan.” She suggests, we should not complain about the “kind of people who eat popcorn while watching the Ring cycle”. Is that a valid point? Akbar (again) tells of a teenager alternately reading from his phone and attentively watching the play . It was Shakespeare. “This is how young people consume culture” and “his phone’s tiny light did not impinge my enjoyment” she says. So that’s OK then. No, it is not!

Today (8/04/23 – here’s the LINK) the same paper reports on the musical The Bodyguard being curtailed in Manchester when “audience members refused to stop singing along….police (were) called and disruptive theatregoers removed.”

What etiquette? Photos from the play “Appropriate Audience Behaviour”

Nick Curtis in the Evening Standard reported another viewport. A specialist in audience research, Dr Kirsty Sedgman, says audience demographics are changing, particularly so since lockdown. Theatres are striving to attract a wider representation of the prospective audience range to avoid accusations of elitism. That may be good in itself but it brings theatre etiquette into focus and puts “the traditional (older, white, wealthier) audience” on the defensive. “The ubiquity of mobile phones and the way social media has both accelerated and debased debate have broken the unspoken contract that existed in theatre. We have got used to recording every event and aggressively expressing every thought immediately.” Some frown at such behaviour. Let me know what you think.

Of course there are limits to observe. The problem is one person’s ‘you are irritating me’ is another’s dismissive ‘that’s your problem!’. I like to do it my way and quote Shakespeare – “The play’s the thing”. Any show is best experienced straight, sober, without additional embellishments. Of course I have to admit that in Will’s day audiences expected to heckle actors, enjoy a pot of ale, suck oranges, behave as they would in the market place. Are we now returning to those ways, all because we were locked down for a while and now want freedom to be selfish, ignorant, and ignore our neighbours’ sensibilities? Let’s hope not. Theatre is a communal experience so let’s all enjoy it together. Now, on with the show and out with the tipple.


07/03/23 Mike writes –

Mamma Mia ! , I exclaim – you HAVE to watch this video! Fans or not of the show, you will never have seen the inside of the Novello Theatre like this before. Take a bird’s eye view, soar around the rehearsal in progress, into the auditorium, backstage, the dressing rooms, and never touch the ground. It’s immersive!
Drone, steadicam, or just damn clever filming – do watch it.
Click on the picture of the Novello and go straight into the theatre…..


20/02/23 Mike writes –

It’s Dynamic!

We always try to offer you a discount on theatre tickets but some theatres are more generous than others. And some use sleight of hand pricing tricks. When we booked your seats for Moulin Rouge we asked what discount we were being given. Our seats are £67 but to buy those individual seats in the mid-price range yourself, it would cost you £85…..for now. We were told that that box-office price could be increased later. It’s called Dynamic Pricing. I call it Deceitful Pricing.

Many theatres do it. Every theatre has specific price bands, but they are flexible. If a show sells well, the more expensive price bands will be extended to cover less expensive seats. Or prices may just be increased. Those £85 seats for Moulin Rouge (only £67 to you) could be increased later to £89 or £99, the other mid-priced bands. The Moulin Rouge top price is currently (February 2023) £175 and all prices will rise for the summer season.

Another trick when you book is tickets being withheld from sale. You check the seating plan and find few seats are available, so you book quickly to ensure you don’t miss out. Then later, abracadabra, more seats magically appear. Of course it’s not magic. Some seats can be hidden by the Box Office and then put on sale later. Sometimes cheaper seats are held back to promote the expensive ones. As an example I was recently emailed to be told that, for Cabaret, more tickets had been made available for certain performances. Where had they been hiding? Well, either they had previously been withheld from sale or, and here’s another possibility, they had been returned by Ticket Agencies which had not sold them. It is customary for agencies to periodically return their unsold allocation of tickets and then maybe apply for a new allocation.

All this is to encourage punters to pay a higher price. To be fair, I should suggest that the early bird catches the worm, or the early booker bags the better seats. It applies to us too – book with us early when we can accommodate requests more easily. And befor eprices rise.

Should you need to book theatre tickets for yourself, not with Fredo’s Theatre Group, I guess most of you would try an online agency first. Agencies have to charge booking fees to cover their own costs and make a profit too. These extra charges can only be avoided by booking at a theatre’s Box Office. But agency fees vary, and you want to buy as economically as possible, don’t you? Your first port of call should always be the agency associated with a particular theatre’s owner – for example Delfont Mackintosh, Nimax Theatres , Ambassadors Theatre Group, or Lloyd Webber Theatres. They charge the lowest extras. There are only a few independent theatres and they are best booked direct.

But also there are other agencies, unconnected to specific theatres, with names such as Box Office, London Theatre and Theatre Direct. They cover most theatres but will often charge higher prices. You will want to look elsewhere unless, of course, they have the only seats left and you are prepared to pay the highest price. Yes, I know it’s complicated, so….

On our website’s LINKS page I have listed details of which theatres are associated with which owner/agencies – it will save you money to book with these agencies. But it wont save you as much as booking with us! 


14/02/23 Mike writes

Actor Awards go gender-neutral

The theatre awards season is here again and first off, setting the trend, are the WhatsOnStage Awards (voted for by the on-line public). This year there are no Best Actor or Best Actress awards as we must not think of actors as Men and Women, they are just Performers. This leads us to the headline in my newspaper – “Female talent sweeps board in gender-neutral theatre awards.”

So no male actor was worth an award this year? Untrue! It has been left to Joe Locke (Best Professional Debut in The Trials at the Donmar) to represent male achievement in the acting stakes, while women (winners in Best Performance and Best Supporting Performance in both Plays and Musicals categories) look as if they have reaped the benefit of political persuasion and positive discrimination.

My reasoning: when awards are gender-neutral there will always be a significant minority that will be influenced, for or against, by gender trends and vocal activism, and maybe sway the balance ignoring talent. It happened in the Brits (no female nominees) and now the pendulum has swung the other way in these awards. A ricocheting pendulum, as changeable as the weather, benefits no-one of any gender.

I see in the Times poll that about three quarters of us still want gender specific awards, and yet Theatre seems determined to pander to the tiniest minority (the non-binary) whose only contender for any award this year must surely be Emma Corrin in Orlando. They gave an exceptional performance but certainly not worth blinding us to the gender of other contenders.

Jodie Comer won her award for Best Performer in a Play (Prima Facie, the powerful monologue), and she certainly deserved a Best Actress Award. But does no male actor equal her performance, deserve an award too? In this Age of Equality it seems some can be pushed ahead in the equality stakes. You may think I’m wrong, but only awards for different genders can avoid such unfair anomalies. .


31/01/23 Mike writes –

The Survey: the results

The results are in, as they say, and we have had an interesting response to our Survey. Thank you to everyone who replied – we are grateful to you for your answers. We sent the survey to a random but large number of Group members and received about a 50% response from those who we presume are our most keen theatregoers.

Since the lockdown most of you who replied have joined us at the theatre on several occasions.  We have a lot of long-timers – 40% of you have been coming with us for more than ten years, Two thirds of you like plays, both new and classic, and three quarters love musicals. No surprise there! Unfortunately, I forgot to ask about opera and ballet, but already 34 have booked for the upcoming visit to Covent Garden for the ballet Woolf Works.

We asked your preference between Evening or Matinee performances, both received a quarter of votes but half said they had no preference.

With the rising prices of theatre tickets and coaches, it was good to know half of you would pay up to £80 for a ticket+coach, a third would pay £80 for ticket-only and £100 with coach, and many would pay more for a special event. Understandably, half of you regard discounted prices as ‘Quite important’ and over 80% want to keep joining us at least as much as in the past. Those who didn’t reply may not.

There was a surprise when we asked who would still buy discounted tickets if you had to find your own way to the theatre without a coach. Of course many London members of the Group do this already, but the total response was about half and half, for Would and Wouldn’t; it was a Brexit split! Less surprisingly, 60% of you visit a theatre mostly with the group and 13% only with the Group.

It’s really good to know that the half of you that responded to the Survey still want to keep coming. The other half…well, perhaps you don’t like answering Questionnaires…but we hope all of you will feel like joining us again soon. However, we know numbers are not what they used to be. We need at least 30 of you to make a coach financially viable, and at least 10 or sometimes 20 to obtain a group discount. The Survey has been a great help, and an eye-opener, to us in deciding what we can offer you in these challenging times.

If you would like to response to our findings, please do email us or give us your thoughts on the YourComments  (publicly) or Contact (just to us) pages of the website. We do read them all.

Here are the questions and your percentage answers –

Q1. In 2021 and 2022 (with limited opportunity due to lockdown) we organised 40 theatre visits. How often have you joined us on a theatre visit in the last TWO years?

Once or Twice 37%
More frequently 45%
Not at all 13%

Q2. What type of shows do you prefer? Tick as many as you like.

Classic play rvivals 65%
New plays 66%
Musicals 76%
Comedies 50%
Concerts 49%

Q3. Do you prefer Matinee or Evening performances?

Evening 25%
Matinee 25%
No prefernce 50%

Q4. How long have you been a member of Fredo’s Theatre Group.

Less than 5 years 17%
Between 5 and 10 years 30%
More than 10 years 40%
I have not booked with you yet 13%

Q5, Ticket prices are rising. Most Top Price West End seats are now around £100/£150. We try to keep prices affordable for Stalls or First Circle seats by offering Group or Senior Discounts, or a cheaper price band. We also support the cheaper OffWestEnd theatres like the Donmar, Almeida and Hampstead. Please tell us your MAXIMUM budget per theatre visit (with/without coach)

Maximum £60/£40 with/without coach 17%
Maximum £80/£60 with/without coach 30%
Maximum £100/£80 with/without coach 40%
Sometimes more for special occasions 13%

Q6. We try to offer you Group discounted tickets whenever possible. The discounts vary from a few pounds to about half the price. They are only available on Mondays to Thursdays. How important is it to you to be able to buy the tickets we offer you at a discount?

Very important 33%
Quite important 51%
Not so important 14%
Not at all 2%

Q7. In the NEXT twelve months, are you likely to join us on theatre visits more or less frequently?

More frequently 33%
Less frequently 4%
About the same 51%
Don’tknow 12%

Q8. We need about 30 members using our coaches to make a theatre visit by coach viable. We are considering offering occasional theatre visits with discounts for smaller groups, but WITHOUT coach travel (Minimum 10 people). You would have to make your own way to and from the theatre. Is this an option you would consider?

Yes 52%
No 48%

Q9. We would like to know how often you arrange to visit a theatre yourself, without the discount and convenience of Fredo’s Theatre Group. Please tick appropriate box below.

I most often visit theatres WITHOUT the Group 27%
Most of my theatre visits are WITH the Group 60%
I ONLY visit theatres WITH the Group 13%

Q10. Some of you have memberships of theatre mailing lists. Please tell us which theatres you are a member of, apart from Fredo’s Theatre Group, of course!

DonmarWarehouse 13%
NationalTheatre 29%
Almeida 11%
Hampstead 4%
Old Vic 4%
English National Opera/Royal Opera House 16%

NOTE: Some percetages do not add up to 100% as some questions had multiple answers. A big THANK YOU to everyone who took part.


30/01/23 Mike writes –

What was that you said?

I said it last July
but here’s another reminder –

Sometimes, at the theatre, I cannot always hear what the actors are saying. Maybe you have the same problem. Many reasons – acoustics, natural speaking, poor projection, distant voices, set design, overlapping sound, stage direction, all of these reasons – or is it just me? Others hear, no problem, no complaints. It didn’t used to happen, I tell myself, so what has changed? 

The most obvious reason is that I have changed, I have grown older. Certain frequencies, lighter tones, I cannot hear so well as in the past. In face-to-face conversation I can both listen and lipread but not in a theatre, especially if actors are not facing me or speaking quickly. I’m sure I’m not alone. What’s to be done? 

We can look for reasons in us or the theatre, but really it’s not the reasons that matter but the solution to the problem. And there is an obvious solution. I can use a theatre’s free hearing devices. Most theatres have them on request. I have found most gadgets work like magic with distant actors talking right into my ear, better than normal conversation. And so I am adding a sticky note to my theatre tickets to remind me – ask for a hearing device at the theatre before the performance. I may not need it, but if I do it’s there for me and I have no reason to complain afterwards. 

If you have a similar problem, and I suspect many of you have, do what I do and then let’s enjoy our theatre visits even more.


18/01/23 Fredo writes –

TROUBLING THE MAGNOLIAS
A report on a Q&A with the cast of Watch on the Rhine

They’re a symbol of peace and contentment, those white magnolias that line the boulevards in Washington. They’re also a symbol of complacency, and in Lillian  Hellman’s 1941 play Watch on the Rhine, they symbolize narrow horizons. Mike and I attended the Director’s Forum performance to find out more.

Hellman made a career of troubling the magnolias, in her plays The Little Foxes, The Children’s Hour and The Searching Wind. Her chosen style as a playwright embraces melodrama – emotions are heightened, scenes are resolved with an edge-of-seat climax. Does this mean that her plays are now dusty relics from a bygone age, the Literary Manager of the Donmar asked the cast.

The visiting German actor Mark Waschke suggested he should ask the audience: had we found any relevance in what might seem like an old-fashioned, well-made play? The response was that the audience had found the impact of the play overwhelming. John Light added that he had read the play when he was called to audition for it with some ambivalence: yes, of course he wanted the job, but he also thought it was very much a play that should be put on.

Patricia Hodge, who plays the leading role of the liberal-minded matriarch, said that she hadn’t heard of the play, but was interested as it was written by Lillian Hellman. She considered, given the world situation and movement of refugees,  that the revival was timely, and this is not a play that can be put on at any old time. It can’t be done without reflecting what is happening at the moment. And if it is being staged, the best way to do it is at a theatre like the Donmar, where the audience is not protected from the action by a proscenium arch.

As the play is set in the 40s before America entered the war, the actors needed tuition in the political situation in both Germany and the USA. Carlyss Peer described how Cambridge academics had lectured them on the period, and how the director Ellen McDougall had given them research exercises to carry out. She and John had to find photographs of all the real-life people mentioned in the text. However, Tamar Laniado, one of the child actors, confided that her favourite moment in rehearsal was baking cookies (she’s mastered the art!).

Mark, a leading actor in his native Germany and at the renowned Schaubuhne in Berlin, recalled being involved in anti-Fascist movements when he was a teenager, and he could therefore relate to the play’s theme of where does responsibility start? Like another recent visitor, Miri Misika in The Band’s Visit, he found rehearsing a play in this country very different from his previous experience. It appears that European directors are , well, more directive. In this country, more artistic input is invited from the company, and this licence is liberating for the actors. Tamar and her “brother”, young Finley Glasgow, agreed: the crucial moment when the family arrive from Germany  has been  staged and restaged since the first rehearsals. As Patricia said, every moment is crafted by the collective, and of course needs time to ripen. She also revealed that a professor of history, tutoring the cast, confided that he could not imagine “this old war horse of a play’ working on stage today. Then he came to see it and was moved to tears at the end!

Lillian Hellman was and always will be a controversial figure who divides opinion over the worth of her dramas. But, Patricia pointed out, at the end of the day she’s telling a fictional story. The consensus was that this is a powerful one, and once again has found its moment at the Donmar.


06/01/23 Fredo writes –

FORTY YEARS ON –
A Report on our Group theatre visits in 2022

It was a challenging year for Theatreland, and theatreguys. Covid hasn’t quite gone away, which meant that audiences stayed away and, because of cast illnesses, many performances were cancelled. Prices continued to rise, there was disruption to travel, and tourists were slow to return. Then to add to the difficulties, Arts Council England withdrew funding and drained the life-blood from many of our most loved theatrical addresses.

This was done under the guise of levelling up the regions, but in fact results in levelling down the gold standard set by the National Theatre, the Royal Opera House, and cherished venues such as the Donmar, Hampstead and the Almeida. All have been jumping to the Arts Council whip for many years and have now been rewarded either by losing their grants or having them severely cut back. Shame.

The impact of this perverse decision will be revealed in the next year, as these institutions adjust to their new situation. Inevitably prices will have to increase. We wish them well and hope that we can continue to support their activities.

Yet, in a gesture of supreme optimism, impresario Nica Burns opened the first new theatre in the West End for 50 years. We wish her every success in the theatre @sohoplace. And what a splendidly smart, modern and shiny new theatre it is.

Donmar Warehouse

The theatre@sohoplace

In the meantime, Mike and I have had to be selective in the shows we have offered you in 2022. Our aim, as always, is to make interesting theatre available at affordable prices. This meant that we weren’t able to offer many of the shows that we would previously have booked, as the cost of best tickets soared as high as £150 (with most often no group reductions). Our challenge was to find reasonably-priced tickets for shows that enough people would want to see, and importantly to cover the cost of the coach – and yes, rising fuel prices and the ULEZ charge have had a considerable impact on coach travel too.

nutcrackerx. habeas corpus. henryx

This year we offered 30 visits to 27 different shows – just over half of what we achieve in a normal year. We were not able to include an opera, which was sad, but we started and ended the year with a Matthew Bourne ballet: both Nutcracker! and Sleeping Beauty were popular choices. Sadler’s Wells remains an hospitable venue but the Royal Opera House has become more elitist as its prices continue to soar with no group discounts offered.

I’d been looking forward to Habeas Corpus, a revival of one of Alan Bennett’s most successful plays, and the production at the Menier revealed its comic exuberance and its serious theme of our preoccupation with our bodies and our inevitable end. Sadly, after that, the Menier closed for an extended period, and rumours circulated that it would not reopen. However, it is operating again now, and I hope that we will be able to offer a visit in 2023.

Shakespeare had a good year! Henry V, with Kit Harington, provided an exciting evening at the Donmar, while Much Ado About Nothing at the National was both inventive and very funny. Unfortunately, neither play was as well-supported by our Group as I had hoped; is there a message here for the future?

forcexyz. much ago x. dolls housex

Force Majeure / Much Ado About Nothing / A Doll’s House: Part Two

It had seemed for a while as though some of our OffWestEnd theatres were trying a little too hard to satisfy the Arts Council’s diversity and inclusiveness agenda. After an uncertain relaunch in 2022, the Donmar found its feet again with Rory Kinnear at his most hilarious in Force Majeure, and then Henry V followed, which was another success. Did Ibsen’s  A Doll’s House  need a sequel? No, but A Doll’s House – Part Two by Lucas Hnath was a brand new play, bristling with its own ideas and tensions, and giving Noma Dumezweni, June Watson and Brian F O’Byrne the chance to flex their muscles in heavyweight performances.

The Band’s Visit / The Southbury Child / Rose

I’d been dreading Frozen at Drury Lane, as I hadn’t enjoyed the movie. On stage, it was a delight, with exceptional design by Christopher Oram and a transformation scene that still has me gasping in disbelief. Part of the joy was sharing the experience with an audience of very excited children. We completed our much-postponed pre-pandemic bookings for other musicals – the easily enjoyable Pretty Woman, and The Drifters Girl got better and better with each viewing (I saw it 4 times!). Nevertheless, it was the Donmar that came up with the year’s best musical: The Band’s Visit was an unexpected gem, and was one of those magical evenings when all the parts fitted together. Israeli star Miri Misika was spell-binding, and we hope to see the show return.

At the Bridge Theatre, our group enjoyed Alex Jennings and Phoebe Nicholls in The Southbury Child, and also at this address David Hare presented Straight Line Crazy, his best play in years, with a towering performance by Ralph Fiennes. At a much smaller venue, the Park Theatre,  Maureen Lipman as Rose was unbearably moving in this one-woman play.

We have to admit that some choices were more successful than others. On one evening, we had to cancel an outing as we were offering two plays and one was cancelled due to cast illness. It simply wasn’t economically viable to pay for the coach for a half-size group. In truth, I wasn’t too disheartened, as I’d seen one of the plays, and it really wasn’t worthy of presentation (and I have almost never said that about any show before).

What about the ones that got away? Mike and I continued to go OnOurOwn  to shows impractical to organise for the Group (and I hope you’ve read our reviews). We hope some of you were tempted to make your own way to some we recommended. I’m sure everyone would have enjoyed both The Father and the Assassin and Blues for an Alabama Sky, both at the National, but would enough people to fill a coach have booked these unknown plays with unfamiliar casts? Some other theatre productions are just too prestigious to accommodate group bookings. With any luck, there may be a transfer of the classic A Streetcar Named Desire from the Almeida, and then you can see Patsy Ferran’s definitive performance of Blanche DuBois, with Paul Mescal as Stanley – let’s hope for a group discount.

The Father and the Assassin / Blues for an Alabama Sky / A Streetcar Names Desire

Of course, none of this would be possible without the support of our loyal friends and patrons. We are deeply grateful to you (and a special word of thanks to those who helped out when we were indisposed last year) for your continued support. Our thanks too to Cook’s Coaches, and to the patient box-office staffs who have helped us during the year.

In a year of three Prime Ministers and two monarchs, another significant anniversary slipped by unnoticed. In August, it was 40 years since I started the Theatre Group as an occasional outing for my colleagues at work. Back in those days, coach-hire was a fraction of the cost now. My aim was to do the entire visit – ticket + coach – for £10 or less! This was possible because I could claim a percentage of the cost of travel from the East of England Arts Fund.  This year, the average price of the tickets that we offered was £46.40, and that excludes the coach fare. Yes, there have been changes over the years. There have been many thrills and spills to look back on.

Do I ever think of giving up? Frequently! But as long as you continue to support us in sufficient numbers, we’ll do our best to carry on. We look forward to sharing more theatrical experiences with you in 2023.


06/01/23 Mike writes –

THEATREGUYS GO IT ALONE
A report on the shows we saw OnOurOwn in 2022

We may all have different theatrical tastes but the one thing we all have in common is that we enjoy going to the theatre. We also enjoy your enjoyment when we organise our Group theatre visits but, as you know, we visit a lot of theatres OnOurOwn. As we all grow older, perhaps theatre-going seems less important for some people, but happily we still get great pleasure from keeping up with the best of what is on offer, by any means possible. We recommend shows to you via our OnOurOwn page on the website and sometimes use our visits as a test of what we can organise for you.

Looking back over our records of the last year I can see (and remember!) that it has been a surprisingly good year, considering the difficulties following the lockdown. We gave 10 shows a 5-star rating and no less than 22 shows 4 stars.

Cabaret / The 47th

Up there among the most interesting were – Cabaret at the newly created KitKatKlub, with amazing performances from Jessie Buckley and Eddie Redmayne; the weirdly wonderful The Chairs by Ionesco at the Almeida; a disturbingly accurate portrayal of Donald Trump by Bertie Carvel in The 47th at the Old Vic; full-frontal dips (gasp!) in a swimming pool on stage in the Almeida’s Daddy: A Melodrama; a radical new slant on Oklahoma! at the Young Vic; the gay companionship of two old men in Something In The Air at Jermyn Street; the incredible Jodie Comer in Prima Facie for which we even paid top price; a premier outing for the brash new Elton John musical Tammy Faye at the Almeida again; we also visited The Sex Party by Terry Johnson at the Menier which raised some prudish eyebrows; I better not go on…. 

Oklahoma! / Tammy Faye / Into the Woods

However, I must mention one trip out of London to Bath where they had enterprisingly picked up the imaginative production of Sondheim’s Into The Woods which the Old Vic had shamefully rejected for misplaced PC reasons. It should have been brought back to London but there now seems no chance of that happening. But Girl from the North Country, enjoyed 5 or so years ago in London, we saw again in Woking last year – it’s touring so I hope it may return to the West End.

I should note occasional concerts  too – orchestral Sondheim at the Cadogan hall; Joe Stilgoe at Crazy Coqs; and A Musical Chat Show in the basement of the Hippodrome (we do get about!).

Joe Stilgoe / Prima Facie / Good

Very occasionally producers offer us complimentary tickets (8 times this year) which encouraged us, sight seen, to take you to the long running Witness for the Prosecution at County Hall and to Marvellous at the new theatre @sohoplace. At last I saw The Woman in Black, running for 30 years, as part of an invited audience, but it finishes soon – our guest reviewer, Garth, awarded that 5 stars.

In 2021 we much enjoyed The Drifter’s Girl to which we were invited, and eventually we saw it three times by subsequently taking groups to see it in 2022. And our Best Play of the Year was Best Of Enemies – our Group visit to that comes up in February this year.

Best of Enemies. /. Witness for the Prosecution

There were times when my whole theatregoing life paraded before me for a couple of hours – the amazing 30th Birthday Celebration of the Donmar brought back memories; and (I cheat here because we saw it on tv) we cried with delight during  the Sondheim Charity Gala Old Friends, full of familiar old friends from his many shows performing with great love for their material. 

There were disappointments too which we saved you from, but maybe you would disagree. Personally I disliked the popular Grease, and The Lion The Witch and the Wardrobe irritated me; the opera It’s A Wonderful Life just wasn’t; and only a 2 star rating for a short run of a Donmar production which I won’t mention here. But you can still read reports on them all at the 2022 OnOurOwn page.

One luxury we don’t have when we visit theatres OnOurOwn is group discounts. We budget carefully, sometimes choosing Senior priced matinees or, of course, Upper Circle seats. We crammed ourselves into the front row of the third gallery to see David Tennant in Good, and my legs still remember there was no space for them. But £39.50 high up there was preferable to £145 downstairs….and at the Harold Pinter Theatre too, with the worst sight-lines in London. Should we return there for the 75-minute, over-priced and strangely titled Lemons Lemons Lemons Lemons Lemons? Answer: No. Or for the return of Martin McDonagh’s well remembered The Pillow Man? Er…..perhaps.

We clocked up a total of 64 theatre visits OnOurOwn last year, something to cheer about given the high quality shows on offer. But times are changing. I began my regular theatregoing back in 1961, up in ‘the gods’, gradually came downstairs thanks to an increasing salary, and the discounts and offers of Fredo’s Theatre Group. Now the increasing prices are returning me to ‘the gods’ once more. But that’s fine. All I need is better eyesight to see the faces from so far away!


TICKET PRICE WATCH

14/11/22 Mike writes – This is an occasional addition to our website where I highlight the shows which seem to me to exploit theatre fans by charging exorbitant prices for shows which the majority of regular theatre-goers would be unable to afford. This time the culpret is –

This comedy has previously appeared cheaply in other productions at Mountview and various festivals. It is a short and sweet two-character rom-com. In the West End it advertises “Seats from £15” but they are a half dozen at the far back corners of the third tier Gallery. Most of the Stalls are £150/£125/£85. There is NO discount for groups. The play runs just 75 minutes without an interval. The Harold Pinter Theatre, with columns and high curved galleries, offers the worst sightlines in the West End with many marked Restricted View. Beware what you pay for – you may end up with a lemon.

6/11/22 Fredo writes –

BLOW OUT THE CANDLES, DONMAR, AND MAKE A WISH
– Celebrating 30 years of the Donmar

Looking at our programme for the Donmar’s 30th anniversary celebration evening, we could count very few productions that we’d missed (and in truth, a very few that didn’t please us). And as the parade of actors presented souvenirs of just a few of their greatest hits, we were reminded that on the many occasions when the Donmar came up with the goods, there is no better place to be.

Is it really 30 years since we first climbed the stairs to the Donmar Stalls to see Stephen Sondheim’s Assassins? Can 29 years have passed since Alan Cumming plucked one of our Group out of the audience to dance with him on-stage during the interval of Cabaret? And can it possibly be 28 years since Adrian Lester blew out the candles on his Company birthday cake?

The celebration, expertly directed by former Resident Assistant Director Simon Evans, began with Kit Harington striding on stage and launching into a speech from the recent thrilling Henry V – but wait! Paul Chahidi (Privacy) interrupted Kit to tell him that the programme had been changed, and he was no longer included. This gag ran through the evening, as Kit sportingly made several attempts to elevate the tone – and eventually got his reward when he delivered his speech superbly at the very end.

Kit Harington / Martha Plimpton / Rosalie Craig / Hadley Fraser

He was replaced on stage by American star Martha Plimpton (Sweat) with her little dog, singing Wilkomen from Cabaret. She was joined by Omari Douglas (Constellations), Rosalie Craig (City of Angels), and Hadley Fraser (City of Angels, Coriolanus).

The mood changed when Rory Kinnear (Mary Stuart, Force Majeure) and Nikki Amuka-Bird (The Lady from the Sea) presented the tense argument scene from The Real Thing by Tom Stoppard, where Rory uses a cricket bat as a metaphor for writing a play. He delivered it immaculately – almost as good, joked Sam Mendes later, as Stephen Dillane in the Donmar production.

Then one of the moments we’d been hoping for! As soon as we spotted Henry Goodman’s name in the line-up, we guessed that we had a treat in store. Sure enough, Henry took to the stage in the eccentric costume from Assassins and with help from Marc Antolin (The Band’s Visit) did his cakewalk/dance of death to The Ballad of Guiteau. Henry told us afterwards that he felt he hadn’t done it as well as he’d wanted to. We assured him we didn’t agree; he brought the house down (and killed a president!)

If anyone had guessed what was going to happen next, they would have saved it till the end. One of the defining moments in the Donmar’s history was Adrian Lester singing his heart out in the final moments of Company, with tears streaming down his face and not a dry eye in the house. Adrian took to the stage again, and delivered what most surely will be the definitive version of Being Alive – and was rewarded with cheers and a standing ovation, and the sort of exuberance in the audience that takes minutes to settle down, “Adrian Lester! What the fuck!!!” exclaimed Sam Mendes. “He never got a standing ovation for that during the run!” (and he should have, night after night).

Rory Kinnear / Henry Goodman / Julian Ovenden / Julian Ovenden

And so should Julian Ovenden (Merrily We Roll Along, My Night with Reg), another performer who creates excitement just by walking on stage. Julian sang  with  great feeling, Not A Day Goes By reminding us of his debut on that same stage 22 years ago.

Douglas Hodge (Inadmissable Evidence) told us about one that got away. He and Michael Grandage had worked on a musical version of Three Sisters but it hadn’t worked out. However, Michael had particularly liked one of the songs that Douglas had written, and he sang it with great feeling.

Jenna Russell is another consummate performer who has reached that point in her career where she couldn’t put a foot wrong if she tried. She didn’t refer back to her appearance as Cinderella in Into the Woods at the Donmar in 1998, and instead entertained us with two songs from Guys and Dolls, a Donmar production in the West End in 2005. She segued from My Kind of Town to a sparkling rendition of If I Were a Bell, and being Jenna, threw in an anecdote about kissing Ewan McGregor.

The Donmar is very proud of presenting an all-women cast in the trilogy of Shakespeare’s plays, starting with Julius Caesar, followed by Henry lV and finishing with The Tempest. Jackie Clune, Zainab Hasan, Leah Harvey and Harriet Walter reminisced us about this experience, and Leah recalled watching Harriet play Brutus, Henry and Prospero all in one day!

Douglas Hodge / Jenna Russell / Hariett Walter / Monica Dolan

City of Angels was one of the Donmar’s most successful musicals, and Rosalie Craig and Hadley Fraser reminded us why, with two songs from the jazzy score. This was bitter-sweet, as the West End transfer was due to open the day theatres were closed down because of the pandemic.

The Shakespearean theme continued – sort of – when Daniel Monk recited his opening speech from Teenage Dick in 2019. This resetting of Richard lll in an American high school brought the play to life for younger audiences.

In the same year, another American play electrified us. Monica Dolan relived her great speech from Appropriate  in a blistering performance that stripped away the character’s forcefulness to reveal a pit of loneliness and desolation. Give her a belated Olivier award!

Wouldn’t it have been embarrassing if the Donmar was celebrating its achievements during the run of one of its rare misfires? Fortunately, their current production The Band’s Visit is an instant classic, and has earned its place in the pantheon of Great Donmar Shows. We had been praying fervently that we would hear Miri Mesika sing Omar Sharif, and indeed she did oblige, playing the entire scene with Alon Mendoza De Hevia,  and the exceptional band – Andy Findon, David Schrello, Antonio Romero and Baha Yetkin. From my seat, I could see Harriet Walter lean forward to drink in every detail of Miri’s performance.

Miri Mesika / The Band’s Visit

Susan Wokoma (The Shakespeare Trilogy) and Lucian Msamati (he’s on the Board of Directors) came on to finish the evening, but Susannah Fielding (Trelawney of the Wells) and Ron Cook (Faith Healer, King Lear and many more) objected. There was more – but how could one evening encompass 30 years? Finally, Kit Harington got his chance to deliver his speech from Henry V to the assembled cast and a hushed audience. We cheered.

It wasn’t over yet: producer Henny Finch thanked us for our support. We were aware of one unwelcome birthday present that the Donmar hadn’t wanted. Along with several other leading companies, Arts Council England has withdrawn their entire grant. Henny assured us that they were feeling resilient and confident they will be here in 30 years time for another celebration.

Sam Mendes / Michael Grandage / Josie Rourke / Michael Longhurst

Sam Mendes, who was only 25 when he became the first Artistic Director, recalled opening the theatre, and having Stephen Sondheim usher him out of the auditorium during rehearsals. Sam thought they were going to have an argument about an artistic choice he’d made. Instead, Sondheim complained, “Sam, there’s no soap in the toilets.” It was at that moment he realised that running a theatre wasn’t all glamour.

A happier memory was watching the late, great Helen McCrory enter through the audience and cross the stage to exit while watched with longing by Simon Russell Beale and Mark Strong in Uncle Vanya – “the greatest entrance and the greatest exit in one go.”

Michael Grandage described taking over from Sam as being the exact opposite of taking over from Liz Truss. He thanked his associates who helped him, including casting director Anne McNulty. Michael’s tenure had seen the theatre develop outside its four walls, with seasons in the West End. However, he described the Arts Council’s decision as part of the serial incompetence by this body over the years – to thunderous applause.

Josie Rourke had worked at the Donmar as an Assistant  before her tenure as Artistic Director. She recalled her excitement at getting the job, and the terrifying experience of having to sing for Samantha Spiro in Merrily We Roll Along, when Samantha lost her voice during a performance (Stephen Sondhein walked out!)

Michael Longhurst thanked his predecessors – and of course the Donmar audiences and supports. It’s going to be a struggle once again to keep the theatre producing its work to its high standard, but we felt that it is coming out fighting from a position of great strength.

So blow out the candles – that’s our wish. And we’d like to propose a toast: Here’s to another 30 years – and more!

(Mike adds – We must remind ourselves that the Donmar has been ticking boxes over several years with programming celebrating diversity, feminism and inclusion on instruction from Arts Council England (ACE), under threat of their grant being reduced if they didn’t. The Donmar’s grant has now been withdrawn completely on the instruction of Nadine Dorries, the incompetant and now defunct Arts Minister. The Donmar and all its supporters, audiences and beneficiaries have to suffer the result. The Donmar NEEDS all its supporters/members and sponsors now more than ever. And of course it deserves its loyal audiences.


18/10/22 Fredo writes –

SUMPTUOUS MELANCHOLY
A report on the Q&A with the cast of The Band’s Visit

We’d heard that David Yazbek’s The Band’s Visit had won many awards on Broadway, and we’d also heard rumours that the Donmar production was better than the one in New York. Now we’ve seen it, it’s hard to believe that any staging could be more appropriate than this simple one.

Don’t expect jazz hands, or foot-stamping show-stopping production numbers. This musical makes its impact in more subtle ways. As one of the songs says, it’s like “honey in your ears.” It’s impact creeps up on you and when it ended, Mike turned to me and said, “It’s sumptuous melancholy” – and it is.

We recognised very few names in the cast, as most had been recruited in Israel or for their individual musical talents (5 of the cast play their own instruments on stage). When the Director of Development Silvia Melchior brought many of them on for a Q&A, I could only identify them by the names of the characters they had played! Once relaxed, all were enthusiastic to talk about their show with us and between themselves.

Silvia asked them why they had wanted to appear in this show, and Alon Moni Aboutboul replied that there weren’t enough words to explain. Several of his friends had been in the original film, and he had a great affection for it. Miri Mesika, who is a major recording star in her home country, had been told by several friends who saw the show in New York that she had to do it, but she had never dreamed that she would get the chance. When she got the call offering her the role of Dina, she was in the street, and she started to cry, overcome by her sudden joy.

Several cast members are of Israeli or Egyptian ancestry, and had never thought that they would get to play characters from their own backgrounds, or to tell a story about Israel which isn’t politicised.

All the cast praised director Michael Longhurst’s rehearsal methods, though Miri found them a bit confusing to start with. She told us that she complained to her husband about the games they had to play together and the involvement of other members of the cast in her scenes, but he told her to be patient. Now she was enthusiastic; she understood that Michael was moulding the company into an ensemble. And as a bonus, she gets to kiss Sharif Afifi every night.

“I love everything about the Donmar,” Alon told us, “except the money.” Yes, they’re all getting equal pay – even the exceptional and specialised musicians.

It’s a show of individual scenes that explore how brief, chance encounters can illuminate forgotten dreams and open our hearts in unforgettable ways. Open your own heart to smiles and moist eyes, and you won’t forget it either.

Miri Mesika sings “Omar Sharif” from The Band’s Visit. You know who he was, but another mentioned is Oum Kalthoum who was a “legendary Egyptian singer”.


11/10/22 Southend’s JAZZ CENTRE UK – Important information

We have some very disturning news about the Jazz Centre UK at the Beecroft Gallery, Southend. Our friend Digby Fairweather has written to tell us what is happening and I repeat most of his letter below –

Dear all at  TheatreGuys,

As a fellow lover of the arts I wanted to share a problem with you. You may have heard the recent news that The Jazz Centre UK  has been served with 12 month’s notice to quit our premises at Southend’s Beecroft Art Gallery as of 1st August 2023. The Jazz Centre (Charity number CIO:1167421 and set up in June 2016)  is the very first cultural centre for jazz in Britain…

After six years, this has come as a deeply unexpected and unwelcome shock to our Board of Trustees and volunteers – and meetings with Southend City Council’s officers to ask the reasons have met with much less than satisfactory responses. There have been no practical offers of alternative premises so far, nor offers of any kind of financial support for a project in which we have believed very deeply since setting up our Charity in 2016: in short, to set up the first-ever cultural centre  for jazz in Britain after more than 100 years of flourishing activity in the music both internationally and in the UK.

My great friends Fredo and Mike have kindly invited me to ask if members of TheatreGuys might  be prepared to write a short letter protesting our Service of Notice and supporting our project? This would be of great value if so. My personal belief is that American and British theatre contributed centrally to the repertoire of jazz for what might be called its ‘Golden era’ from (say) 1910-1970. And as a lifelong fan of the British and American Musical – I was actually smuggled into a trip to see Rex Harrison and Julie Andrews in ‘My Fair Lady’ (at the Drury Lane Theatre) with our local Womens’ Institute in 1958 at the age of 12! –  I feel that our two genres have much in common and many mutual enthusiams to share. I’m also happy to say that some of your members have joined me at The Sands – my monthly jazz club on Southend Seafront – to enjoy some music too!

I would be devastated if the many and various activities of The Jazz Centre UK (our walk-through history of jazz; our flourishing weekly live jazz presentations; our film club; our fantastic artefacts including Louis Armstrong’s first trumpet, the complete Humphrey Lyttelton collections, Sir John Dankworth’s first piano and so much more)  were to be  brought to a premature end (quite possibly on a rubbish dump)  by the dubious rulings of a local council.

If you could find time to write a letter (or email) it would be truly appreciated. The people who need to read it are:

cllrmulroney@southend.gov.uk (Environment, Culture and Tourism)

scottdolling@southend.gov.uk (ActiveSouthend)

With my sincerest thanks to Fredo, Mike and all of you.

Digby Fairweather

Founder/Lifelong Patron: National Jazz AArchive, Loughton, 1988

Founder/CEO/Creative Adviser: The Jazz Centre UK: 2016-present.

Fredo and Mike add –

Southend has only recently been awarded City status and one would hope that Culture would be top of the list of amenities to offer both residents and visitors alike. The Jazz Centre UK is a 100% volunteer led charity arts & cultural hub – it’s a valuable amenity for Southend and beyond. And yet the Council are not prepared to continue its current support.

We are all Theatre fans and need to show our solidarity with those who like Jazz with similar enthusiasm. Please DO show support for saving the Jazz Centre by signing their petition, calling in at the Beecroft Gallery where the Jazz Centre will welcome you, and most essentially writing to the Council to show your opposition to the shameful decision which jeopardizes the Centre. It’s an essential facility of which Southend should be proud, of which any city should be envious, and which we should all support.

Cllr Carole Mulroney is the cabinet member for Environment, Culture and Tourism who has served notice on the Centre to quit its premises without offering appropriate alternative accommodation. You should address your comments to her but also to your own councillor so all are fully aware of your objections to her decision. The decision MUST be reversed.

The website of Southend Borough Council can be found at this LINK
(updated 21/10/22)


17/09/22 Fredo writes –

SILENT NO MORE: A Q&A with the cast of Silence

It’s always interesting to hear what the cast have to say about a play that they’ve worked on, especially when the performance has divided opinion. As the Donmar’s production of SILENCE had with our friends and us (see Mike’s review OnOurOwn)

Six of the cast joined the Development Director Silvia Melchior and Assistant Director Lata Nobes to discuss the play with the audience. It was immediately obvious that this was a deeply personal project for all  of them, as Rehan Sheikh told us how emotional the first reading had been.

Rehan had heard stories of the Partition of India and Pakistan – the infamous drawing the line on the map in the last days of the Raj – from his grandparents and uncles and aunts. His mother, now in her 80s, had experienced the upheaval as a child. As the discussion progressed, it emerged that his knowledge was unusual, as his fellow actors told how the Silence in the play echoed in their own homes.

Why was this? Did families want to forget the trauma? Did they want to protect their children from their history? Is forgetting a process of continuing to live ?

Bhaskar Patel (on a break from Emmerdale) had been available for the first play reading, and had just turned up, not knowing what the play was about. Tears flowed, and he fought to be in it.

Jay Saighal reminded us that the play is constructed from true stories about real people, but had been crafted by the playwrights. Last week, some of these people had come to see the play, and he met the man he plays (with great charm, I must say).

Some of the stories were more harrowing than others, and Rehan said that it was impossible to play those scenes technically, and he often had to rein in his feelings in performance. These are stories you don’t want to forget – Renu Brindle agreed: she thinks of her own mother being parted from her mother, and sent off on a train with her siblings; she thinks of the uncomplaining strength of her grandmother. This play was a story she felt she had to tell.

The play contained several scenes in which the dialogue was briefly in Punjabi, and our friend Margaret asked about this bilingual element. Lata said that the meaning came over because of the context and the body language of the actors, and that in Anglo-Asian households, language is fluid (and with my mother’s Italian family, I can add that this happened in my home as well).

Many members of the audience who had stayed for the discussion were second and third-generation Indian, and their strength of feeling was palpable. Why does Silence surround the subject of Partition? Why were we not taught in school? Why are their parents and grandparents so defensive, so guarded, so silent? There was a sense of relief that a wound had finally been exposed.

While I had reservations about the play as a piece of drama, I can’t argue with its value in opening a conversation which seems long overdue. Fortunately, the play is a co-production with Tara Arts, and will be seen again in another location. This will help end the silence.

Subsequently: 18/09/22 The Leicester News website reports –

Appeals for calm and an end to violence after days of unrest in Leicester

Community leaders are said to be on the ground with officers and are urging people to avoid the area. 

The incident follows a spate of violence and disorder of the area of the city, which started when a fight broke out in Melton Road, Belgrave after the Asia Cup Cricket match between India and Pakistan on Sunday, August 28, leading to eight arrests. Continued unrest between some members of the Hindi and Islamic communities in the area in the days that followed led the police to launch an operation and make 19 more arrests.

(This is the 75th anniversary year of India’s partition.)



16/08/22 – Premium Pricing

Julian Sturdy-Morton and his wife Maria run a social and theatre-going group not dissimilar to our own. He wrote a piece about Premium seats and has kindly agreed to let us reprint it here as we thought it would be of interest to you. Their website can be found at abitoftlc.org.

“Premium seats are the very expensive ones in the middle of the stalls. The puddle of premium seating waxes and wanes in line with public demand so that sometimes there are very few and at other times the premium seats dominate.

When we book, we try to get as close to ‘Premium’ as possible while sticking to the far more fairly-priced Band A tickets. The result is that you frequently sit among premium seats next to people who paid 3 to 4 times as much – for example, for Leopoldstadt TLC members paid £49.50 per ticket, other Band A 4patrons paid £75 and Premium paid £150 while, on the night, we were all sitting side by side. 

Unfortunately, the pandemic means theatres need (want) to maximise revenues. They frequently start out with many more premium priced seats than they will sell. They are being heavily criticised in the press for doing so and, in our opinion, quite rightly too. Notwithstanding, we shall keep pushing to get the best value for our members.

Mike adds – We couldn’t agree more. We too obtained a Group discount for Leopoldstadt and continue to take advantage of Group discounts whenever we can. However, theatres are now reluctant to offer discounts and often only offer them once they realise that their higher priced seats are not selling well. This has happened at the Bridge Theatre where we have had to push for a Group discount before they considered it. Other theatres do as Julian says and reduce Premium Price seats to Top Price if they do not sell. Of course the Top Price is also a high price so we always try to offer you reasonable priced tickets even when we receive no Group discount.

Staff and performers need to earn a living, “times is hard”, so these days the compromise between covering a production’s costs and encouraging an audience to book becomes increasingly difficult. Off West End theatres still offer great value, so we try to balance high prices with low prices to make our average theatre-going price more affordable. We tell you what you save, when you save it, but please don’t forget that most West End Top Prices are now well over £100. And Premium Seats can be much much more. That’s show business!

We would love to show you an example of seating areas at different prices, but theatre seating plans are copywright and those areas can be changed from time to time during a production’s run. They call it Dynamic pricing. We call it Deceitful pricing.

25/07/22 Fredo writes –

Welcome VISIT

Because we’re members of the Donmar’s Director’s Forum, we are invited to special meetings to hear about their forthcoming productions. Last week, we had the opportunity to find out more about their next one, The Band’s Visit.

This was intriguing. We knew that it was based on a movie, but somehow that had passed us by. The show had been a success on Broadway, and had won 10 of the 11 TONY Awards for which it was nominated. But what was it about, and why didn’t we know the songs? It seemed that only our friend Jan knew about it, and she told us that she plays the cast album over and over.

We gathered in the Green Room at the Donmar’s headquarters in Dryden St to hear the Artistic Director Michael Longhurst tell us why he had chosen this as his first musical at the Donmar. As an introduction, we were serenaded on the oud (a Middle Eastern lute) by the Music Consultant Attab Haddad.

Michael told us that first of all he was anxious to direct a musical during his tenure at this theatre, and had had discussions about which shows were possibilities. One of his colleagues suggested this one, and Michael recalled that there was a great buzz about it during one of his visits to New York.

He discovered that it was based on an Israeli film from 2007, which had won prizes from the Israeli Film Academy.. The story is simple: the Alexandria Ceremonial Police Band are on their way to give a concert in Israel, but are given tickets to the wrong destination, and have to spend the night in a remote village before they can catch a bus the following day. They are taken in by the residents and a all lives are touched by the accidental crossing of their paths.

So far, so very Come From Away.  However, the Assistant Director Orr, who is a Moroccan Jew whose family live in Israel, explained the importance of the film in his homeland; it showed without emphasis the similarities of Israel and its neighbours. While the film and the show make no direct reference to the conflict between Israelis and Arabs, it underlies the transactions between the characters who open their hearts and homes to the visitors.

Michael told us how he had to wrestle the rights to do the first European production of the show in the face of great competition from other companies. The show ran for 589 performances on Broadway, and even recouped its capitalisation (a rare occurrence). He was surprised that producer Barbara Broccoli  (yes, of James Bond fame) agreed to allow the Donmar to show it, but she wanted to transfer the Broadway production onto the Donmar stage.

Michael held out to do his own staging, and eventually won. With Orr, he visited Tel Aviv, and experienced the “hosting” that the country is famous for. He wanted to explore this generous culture; what he didn’t want to do was “Broadwayfy” the piece. 

Nigel Lilley, the Musical Director, pointed out that David Yazbek who wrote the music and lyrics, specifically wanted to do the film as a musical, and not to override it. Actor Peter Polycarpou agreed that the show is about small exchanges of people’s lives, and it would be wrong to overwhelm it with business.

Peter is the only member of cast whose name has been revealed. Michael felt that it was important for this show to have performers who have some lived experience to share, and has been negotiating to bring over some actors from Israel and Egypt – fingers crossed that they can sort out visas.

But there are other issues: there will be 5 musicians on stage, playing traditional instruments, as well as 4 off-stage musicians. Also one of the actors has to play the violin, so casting has very specific needs for this show.

Will it look like the Broadway version? No, it will have a different design aesthetic, depending more on atmosphere than on replication.  All in all, it sounds like the perfect Donmar show, one that will bloom and flourish in the intimate setting of this theatre.

I can see it having a broad appeal to lovers of music and drama, and who enjoy stories that bring people together in this divided world. I have already secured a booking for you, and will announce the date very soon. Watch this space! I’m planning to see it twice.

(Above photos and advertisements for The Band’s Visit relate to the earlier film and broadway production)

06/07/22 Mike writes –

I have a confession to make –

Sometimes, at the theatre, I cannot always hear what the actors are saying. “Louder, speak up, project!” I want to shout, but of course I don’t. Is it them or is it me? I don’t wear hearing aids and normally I can hear live conversations, pins drop, distant dogs barking, whispers I’m not supposed to hear, the list could go on. So why is it different in the theatre? 

Many reasons – acoustics, natural speaking, distant voices, set design, overlapping sound, direction, all of these reasons – or is it just me? Others hear, no problem, no complaints. It didn’t used to happen, I tell myself, so what has changed? 

The most obvious reason is that I have changed, I have grown older. Certain frequencies, lighter tones, I cannot hear so well as in the past. In face-to-face conversation I can both listen and lipread but not in a theatre, especially if actors are not facing me. To other people I can say “Pardon?”, “What?”, and grumble “Don’t mumble!”, but not in a theatre. I’m sure I’m not alone. What’s to be done? 

We can look for reasons in us or the theatre, but really it’s not the reasons that matter but the solution to the problem. And there is an obvious solution. I can use a theatre’s free hearing devices. Most theatres have them on request. The National’s gadgets I have found work like magic with distant actors talking right into my ear, better than normal conversation. And so I am adding a sticky note to my theatre tickets to remind me – ask for a hearing device. I may not need it, but if I do it’s there for me and I have no reason to complain afterwards. 

If you have a similar problem, and I suspect many of you have, do what I do and then let’s enjoy our theatre visits even more.

|

06/07/22 Fredo writes –

Another Knock on the Door – A Q&A with the cast of A Doll’s House: Part Two

Our expectations were high when we went to the Donmar for the Director’s Forum performance of A Doll’s House – Part Two. We’d read and heard interesting things about this play (one of our friends had already seen it twice!) but we also knew that the Donmar has had a testing time recently; two members of the cast have had Covid, and performances had to be cancelled. And high hopes are sometimes disappointed..  

This was not to be the case on this occasion.  From the moment that Rae Smith’s set opened to reveal the arena where the battles of the play would be enacted, we were gripped. It’s a play of conflict and from the audience’s point of view, roller-coaster reversals of sympathy. Each scene is basically a duologue with the participants battling it out in the ring. My mind raced to keep up with the arguments of the play, and by the end we were exhausted and exhilarated.

Not so the cast, who came back on stage looking as fresh as daisies (or some appropriate Norwegian wild flowers). Thomas Heogh asked them if it was necessary to bring baggage from Ibsen’s original play to understand this one. Noma Dumezweni, the incandescent Nora, disagreed: playwright  Lucas Hnath knew what he was doing in using Ibsen’s play as a springboard to examine relationships between women and men, and to look at how much – or little – things had progressed. Yes, the cast had delved into the world of Ibsen, added the Ibsen lookalike Brian F O’Byrne. They had read A Doll’s House, they had had fascinating talks from people like Baroness Helena Kennedy on the development of divorce laws in Norway and Britain (Britain lags far behind), but at the end of the day, the actors were left with the script to work with and bring to startling life.

Nora’s point of view in the play is challenged by the other characters, and June Watson as the elderly nurse  Anne Marie embodies more tradional values. We hear Nora’s arguments first, and watch as Anne Marie tries to absorb what she is hearing.  There should be some way of preserving June’s scenes with Noma as a masterclass for future generations of actors. In June’s performance, Anne Marie’s initial passivity changes in shocking ways. 

Patricia Allison, as Nora’s daughter Emmy presents other challenges. This is like a flashback to Nora before her marriage to Torvald, but with what Emmy believes is an enlightened, almost feminist, stance. This is a pivotal scene in the play, as it explains Nora’s ultimate decision. Once again director James MacDonald shapes it beautifully.

The language of the play is rich, with long speeches, delivered with such ease by all the cast that your attention never wanders – and then Lucas Hnath jolts us with an anachronism to remind us that this isn’t a play about 19th century Norway – it’s a play about universal themes with an urgency for today. No, you don’t need to have seen Ibsen’s play. this play stands alone as an argument, a drama, an immensely satisfying and provocative experience. 

We can’t wait to see it again.

24/05/22 Fredo writes –

A Knock on the Door – Our introduction to A Doll’s House – Part Two

Noma Dumezweni plays Nora
June Watson plays the nanny
Brian F O’Byrne plays Torvald

It isn’t every day that Mike and I are invited to the Royal Norwegian Embassy in Grosvenor Square, and we were excited to dress up in our Sunday best and enjoy an evening of Scandinavian hospitality. We were welcomed by the Cultural Attache, Lars-Erik, and soon found ourselves chatting to familiar friends from the Donmar Warehouse, among Friends of the Donmar.

The occasion was a meet-and-greet with the actors, director and designer of the Donmar’s upcoming production of A Doll’s House – Part 2. This was intriguing: the Donmar staged an excellent production of A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen, Norway’s internationally renowned dramatist, some years ago. In the meantime, we had visited Ibsen’s apartment in Oslo a few years back, where we learned that this play is one of the 10 most performed plays in the world, one which examines the position of a woman in marriage and society. The play ends shatteringly and controversially with the central character Nora leaving her home, husband and children, and slamming the door. Why would a playwright in this century want to measure himself against that world-renowned drama?

That was a question that Thomas Heogh asked the new play’s director, James Macdonald. James replied that Ibsen had addressed many issues in his play that remain alive today, and can be challenged and appraised from a 21st century perspective. The writer Lucas Hnath has a talent for debate, for arguing from different points of view, and this makes for tense confrontation. Ibsen ended his play with a door slamming; Hnath starts his 15 years later, with a knock on the same door, as Nora returns to settle scores with her husband Torvald, to meet the daughter that she left behind, and to make peace with the nanny who took over her maternal duties. 

Thomas had started the conversation by asking Noma Dumezweni (Linda, The Undoing) to imagine that she was the first actress to play Nora in Ibsen’s play: how would she feel as she was about to go on stage for the first performance? Noma laughed, and said that she hadn’t thought of that, and confessed that she had never seen A Doll’s House,  or even read it. But she did feel challenged by the new play’s relevance, and especially by starting rehearsals playing such an important character from the earlier play. One elderly gentleman in the audience asked her if he was going to be preached at about feminist issues. She tactfully and politely told him this was a play of discussion where every viewpoint was given a fair chance for those prepared to come and listen.

Veteran actor June Watson (66 years on stage! Mrs Lowry and Son) admitted that she too had never seen or read Ibsen’s play. However, she was pleased to be in Part 2, as she has some major scenes, while in the original her character had only a very few lines.

Brian F O’Byrne has briefly abandoned his award-winning Broadway career to return to the London stage for this production. He shared the enthusiasm that Noma, June and James showed for the play. The scenes between the previously controlling Torvald and the now liberated Nora promise to be electric.

And then for something really exciting: designer Rae Smith revealed how she will create the doll’s house on a reconfigured Donmar stage, so that the audience can peer into it from different angles, to have a different perspective on the play’s arguments. 

This was a delightful and informative discussion, and there was a clear feeling of commitment and camaraderie among the cast and company. They were excited about the play, and it made me urgently want to see what Lucas Hnath had to add to Ibsen’s masterpiece.

We still have a small number of tickets available for our group visit on Monday 11 July. This one shoul;d be sensational. Don’t miss it!

(Mike adds: Our ‘tourist’ visit to Ibsen’s house and talk by the docent was mentioned by Fredo in a question to the cast, and afterwards we were able to chat with them and answer their own questions in return! Their enthusiasm for more information and friendly talk about bringing our Group to see their play, this was a connection we certainly appreciated as did they.)

10/05/22 Fredo writes –

THE LAST MIDNIGHT – Thoughts on the closure of Lloyd Webber’s CINDERELLA

I can’t help feeling sorry for Andrew Lloyd Webber. He has worked harder than many other producers to revitalise the West End, and to lure audiences back to the theatre after lock-down. He has reopened his shows, and has spent a fortune refurbishing the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane to more than its former splendour.

Yet his luck has run out with his latest venture,  Cinderella, at the Gillian Lynne Theatre. With diminishing audiences and escalating costs, the time came for –  in the words of another fairy-tale musical – Boom, Crunch. The cast were called on stage after a Sunday matinee and given the news. No-one likes to be out of a job, especially now, and Sir Andrew has been the focus of opprobrium ever since. It’s worth taking a look at what went wrong.

Bad timing We were slowly emerging from lock-down when booking opened for Cinderella and possibly audiences weren’t confident about returning to the theatre. Sir Andrew spent big money on creating a safe environment, but people still worried about having to travel to the theatre. Then Coronavirus struck again, and there were closures and cancellations and all sorts of uncertainty. I’m sure money was flowing out to maintain the show, even while it was closed.

Bad marketing Any show called Cinderella is going to attract a family audience, but parents aren’t going to take their children out on a school night. Therefore, the theatre is going to depend on groups to fill the stalls. Unfortunately, the groups department at LW Theatres is impenetrable: you can’t phone to discuss dates, prices and options; you have to e-mail and wait for them to get back to you. That was my experience, and in the end, I booked with a more established and reliable agency, Delfont Mackintosh, where the staff are friendly and helpful. The Drury Lane Theatre is part of the LW Group, and it was the same – only worse – when I booked Frozen. On this occasion, I booked with Groupline, part of the Ambassadors Theatre Group. Even then there was a problem, as LWT didn’t release the tickets to ATG until 10 days before the performance. In case I hadn’t already concluded how unsatisfactory their service was, LWT supplied tickets that spanned aisles, which made it difficult to keep family groups together.  To add insult to injury, the tickets were supplied as e-tickets, which meant that Mike had to print them in order to distribute to them. Yes, of course, I complained to both ATG and LWT. I had a very positive response from ATG, who assigned me a named assistant to help me with future bookings. And from LWT? Not a dickie-bird.

Bad Cinderella That’s one of the songs, and unfortunately, it sort of sums up the show; it just isn’t very good. Oh, it looks fabulous (you can see where the money went) but I was bored. The problem is that it doesn’t seem to know what audience it’s aiming at. There isn’t enough romance or magic, which surely is the least we expect from any version of this story. The feisty heroine is unconvincing and way off target to appeal to a younger audience. The twists in the plot are uncomfortably and self-consciously “adult”. There is innuendo in the dialogue, but it’s neither as outrageous nor as funny as the Palladium pantomime. It doesn’t please parents, and I can’t imagine it entertains children either. (Trigger Warnings state: Contains strong language. Contains scenes of a sexual nature. Despite the Queen’s tight laws in Belleville, please be advised that some swear words and adult themes are found in Cinderella.) It targets an audience somewhere between Matilda and SIX, and misses. And why see this travesty when real magic is happening further down Drury Lane, where the transformation scene in Frozen is greeted with cheers night after night.

Bad communication  This is where, rightly or wrongly, I have most sympathy with Sir Andrew. He broke the news of the show’s closing to cast and crew after a performance. I’m sure in this age of social media, he had hardly got the words out of his mouth before it was tweeted and added to Facebook and WhatsApp groups. Understandably, performers who were about to take over certain roles were aggrieved – Summer Strallen has been forthright on this subject, and I can understand how she feels. Perhaps it could have been communicated better, but really, there’s never a good way to get bad news.

But let me tell you a story: I went with friends to see the first West End production of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat back in 1973. This was a fairly modest production at the Albery Theatre, and lasted about 40 minutes – it was preceded by an even shorter piece called Jacob’s Journey, since lost and forgotten. We enjoyed the show, and unusually for me, I went to see it again, with the same friends. Again, unusually for me, we went to The Angel and Crown in St Martin’s Lane after the show, and some of the cast members came in as well. In those days, the narrator was played by a man, and I spoke to Peter Reeves,  the actor playing the role. I told him that I was sorry and surprised to read in the Evening Standard that the show was closing. “Is it?” he asked. “I didn’t know that.” I showed him the news in the paper, and that was the first the cast had heard of it. Bad news indeed.

Good luck The story doesn’t end there. Sir Andrew has announced that the show will be retooled and revised and will be presented on Broadway in February next. In the US pantomime is not a tradition as in the UK, so this new Cinderella may be more welcome. I wish him well. Perhaps there will be a happily ever after, after all.

MARYS SEACOLE: Q&A at the Donmar 07/05/22 Fredo writes –

A WOMAN WHO CARED

Why do some people become celebrated, and their names live on, while others fall out of history and are forgotten? Until recently, that was the fate of Mary Seacole, who led an eventful life, and whose work as a nurse in the Crimean War was eclipsed by another, more conventional, Victorian lady.

This year, the first major biography of Mary Seacole by Mary Rappaport  has been published, but in 2019 the American dramatist Jackie Sibblies Drury wrote a play about her. Well, not just about Mary, but about women like her, carers,  through the ages and how history has treated them.

It isn’t a conventional play, and as there was some puzzlement at the end of the Director’s Forum performance at the Domar, we were anxious to hear what the six actresses had to say about their experience of working on this extraordinary play. The Head of New Work Clare Slater described it as a visceral play, and asked each of the cast what their first reactions were on reading the play.

Kayla Meikle, who plays the title role, admitted that she was so terrified she had tried to persuade the director Nadia Latif not to give her the role. But at the same time, she loved it, and that her initial terror has been replaced by the fear of not doing justice to the character (she needn’t worry). Veteran actress Susan Wooldridge was excited at the chance to show five glimpses of the lives of older women. She was initially confused by the structure of the play, but the rehearsal period clarified the trajectory of the play for her.

Esther Smith had an advantage, as she had played in an earlier play by this dramatist, the Pulitzer Prize-winning Fairview at the Young Vic, which also explored issues of racism. She was excited to have another script by this writer in her hands. Olivia Williams added that her husband, Rashan Stone,  had also been in Fairview, and as that play had blown her mind, she too was excited to be involved in this project.

There were many challenges facing the actresses as they started their work on the play: the language, including making some patois accessible to white audiences; the changes between multiple characters; the physical demands of the movement, and the roller-coaster narrative ride that the play provides. Their commitment was impressive.

They were rewarded for their accomplishment in this complex work by praise from the audience. Kayla, however, was criticised for her Jamaican accent – though the critic was a member of her family! It was touching to see her being congratulated by them, as they gathered for a family photograph as we left the theatre.

HENRY V Q&A at the Donmar – 01/03/22 Fredo writes –

Photos: Helen Murray

THE SPOILS OF WAR

The cheers had scarcely died down in the Donmar at the end of the final preview of Henry V  than 11 members of the cast bounded back into the breach to answer questions from the Director of Development, Silvia Melchior. It had been a long, gruelling evening for them, and an exhilarating one for the audience.

How does it feel, asked Silvia, to perform a play about one country invading another in the light of current events in Europe? Kit Harington (Henry) said that the play they started to rehearse was a response to Britain’s role in Europe following Brexit, but suddenly it became more pertinent and emotional. He noted too that the response from audiences during the preview period had changed as well. The atmosphere on the night of the invasion of Ukraine had been very tense indeed.

Kate Duchene (Exeter) added that this evening, our audience had been very perky, and had given the humorous scenes more laughs. This hadn’t reduced the message of the play, which exposes war in all its brutality. It even, as Kit pointed out, encompassed fake news: how could the much vaunted reports of the English casualties at Agincourt ever have been taken for the truth?

In order to achieve authenticity in the army scenes, the Donmar had called in Tom Leigh, a former Royal Marines Commando, as Military Consultant. Tom had started each rehearsal with rigorous exercises which built stamina. It was, Olivier Huband (Dauphin) added, an excellent way to break the ice. Millicent Wong (Chorus) admitted that she now knows more about using an automatic rife than she should, as well as information about stabbing in the neck. However, Kate voiced a more sobering point: of the 30 men in Tom’s troop, 15 had died in combat in Afghanistan, and a further had committed suicide after the conflict ended.  Jude Akuwudike (King of France) commented that the army had turned these men into killing machines, and they couldn’t find a place in society afterwards.

Is this Henry a hero or not? Few of the cast were familiar with Laurence Olivier’s patriotic account, or with Kenneth Branagh’s flag-waving version., which Olivier  Huband said had coloured his view of the King – until he came to rehearse the play. . Everything in Director Max Webster’s production is supported by the text: the treatment of the prisoners of war at Harfleur, the punishment of the conspirators, the hanging and even the usually comic “leek” scene shows a merciless attitude at work in the play. Anoushka Lucas (Katherine) felts that Henry’s final wooing scene travels from rom-com to troubling coercion quickly, symbolising his relationship with France.

One of the first shocks of this production is that the Chorus is played by Millicent Wong, a young woman from Singapore. She speaks the scene-setting monologues perfectly, but in a less bombastic style than we are used to. This is effective – she’s one of us. 

Another surprise is that the scenes at the French court are played in French, with Shakespeare in subtitles. This commands our attention, and makes us aware that Henry is invading a different culture and society.

And finally, as well some effective cross gender casting, the use of music in the play is remarkable. Four opera singers (who had never taken part in this type of production before) punctuate the action and add to the lustre of the evening.

It’s a triumph for Donmar Associate Director Max Webster, following his success with Life of Pi. It’s V for Victory, in dramatic terms.


FORCE MAJEURE Q&A at the Donmar – 13/01/22 Fredo writes –

THE FORCE OF NATURE

Spoiler Alert for anyone coming to see Force Majeure at the Donmar: this production contains ski-ing, and a lot of snow!

force4 force7

“Are any of you expert skiers?”  Clare Slater, Head of New Work at the Donmar, asked four members of the cast when they joined her on stage after the Director’s Forum performance. Lyndsey Marshal, Raffaello Degruttola and Arthur Wilson all sheepishly owned up to having done a little (and what sensible person goes ski-ing anyway?) Sule Rimi said he’d had no experience, but when rehearsals started, director Michael Longhurst claimed that Sule had told him he knew how to ski. Sule had no recollection of that conversation!

However, the slope that now occupies the Donmar stage had also been in the rehearsal room, and the actors had spent time learning how to manoeuvre on it – “But it’s not the same as snow,” grumbled Arthur, “and there’s an awkward turn at the bottom.”

Clearly the slope, and the snow in performance, took getting used to. Unfortunately, after the first two previews, performances had to be cancelled, as one of the cast tested positive for Covid. For the first time, the Donmar has now engaged a male and female understudy, so that the show can go on.

When preview performances resumed, Michael Longhusrt decided to make some changes. The play has been adapted by Tim Price from a film directed by Ruben Ostlund, and the early scenes are quite short, as in the film. Michael decided that following the key scene in Act One, the audience needed a longer scene to get into the drama. The actors reported of arriving at the theatre and being given new sheets of dialogue and cues. At one performance, Lyndsey admitted that she and Rory Kinnear found themselves briefly saying each other’s lines, and looked at each other in terror as they tried to get back on track.

The other thing that took the cast by surprise was the audiences’ reactions. They hadn’t realised that the play was so funny, and they wondered why the audience was laughing. Clare had realised that Tim would give the story a comic spin and, to my eyes, there were certainly many scenes that were directed to amuse. It seems as well that some audiences become more involved in the drama and tension of the play than in the humour, and Lyndsey thought that the performances of the children – there are three sets, to cover all performances – affected the way that she and Rory play it. They sometimes have to remind themselves that they are a different family from the previous performance.

The film had been shot very rapidly, with a lot of improvisation. The Donmar’s cast had the luxury of a longer than usual rehearsal period, and the chance to analyse the dynamics within the family, especially between Tomas  (Rory) and Ebba (Lyndsey). We had a discussion about their relationship, but I won’t reveal more, as the actors play it so vividly. Find this out for yourself, and the production surprises, when you join our Group visit on 28 January.

I’m not usually a fan of movies being adapted as plays – but as Lyndsey said, why not? There’s more than one way of playing Hamlet – I felt this worked, and I enjoyed it very much. But i won’t be heading for the ski slopes any time soon!

11/01/22 Fredo writes – A report on the year that was

Anything comes….and goes!

“Times have changed,

And we’ve often rewound the clock..”

It was a year like no other, though slightly better than the one that had gone before. For most of 2021, theatres remained closed, then reopened, then closed again, and as I write, the gloom of cancelled performances has descended on casts and crews throughout the country once more.

In a normal year (remember those?) Mike and I were able to offer you 50+ opportunities to go to the theatre and experience the astonishing talent so easily available to us. Yes, there was the occasional misfire, as several patrons rejoice in reminding me; most often it was apparent that we were living in a golden age of theatrical wonder.

In 2021 we were only able to offer a total of 9 shows, spread over 10 visits to the West End. We started with a small party at a concert by the Gay Men’s Chorus, which was a valiant effort under difficult rehearsal conditions. The RSC faltered in their production of The Mirror and the Light, where the weight of history was given an over-hasty summary. And I look forward to further developments from Alex Parker’s Luminaire Orchestra, which we enjoyed, despite a few hiccups in presentation. Perhaps for his next outing, I’ll offer Alex my services as advisor and compere!

We finally got to go to the ball with Cinderella, which was beset by problems of frequent cancellations. It’s an extravaganza, and while its new spin on the traditional story wasn’t to everyone’s taste, you couldn’t argue with the spectacle. We had one of those strange experiences with this show: on our first visit, opinion on the coach was very divided, while on the second trip, everyone loved it! This isn’t the first time I’ve experienced this phenomenon. How does this happen? We’ll never know.

We waited a long time to deliver our first visit to Pretty Woman. In fact, I lost count of the number of times this show was postponed and re-scheduled (and we have two further visits to look forward to in March). I have to admit that my expectations were low, as they often are with movies adapted as musicals. However, I was delighted to be proved wrong, for after an uncertain start, the show took off into a slick production with much to enjoy.

The Drifters Girl was another hold-over (again, another two visits in the Spring) and this was a remarkable triumph both as a production and for the formidably talented cast. It told an interesting story well, and the cast sang a playlist of incredible songs. It joins the pantheon that includes Jersey Boys and Tina. Fortunately, we weren’t there the night that they had to stop the show to eject a couple of very well refreshed revellers, who were soundly rebuked by star Beverley Knight for spoiling the show for the rest of the appreciative audience.

How do ballet dancers maintain their strength and prowess during a lockdown? There was no sign of any loss of power in their presentation of a new work from the ROH, The Dante Project, as the dancers demonstrated that their ability and elegance were undiminished.

I’ve saved my personal highlights till last. Paula Vogel may well have written her play Indecent with me in mind. It had everything: an absorbing story, a theatrical setting with a theatrical presentation that matched it, and heart-stopping performances from the entire cast. The tiny Menier Chocolate Factory always punches above its weight; I’m looking forward to Habeas Corpus there this year.

And what about Anything Goes? Wasn’t this the booster shot in the arm we all needed to kick-start our falling in love with live entertainment all over again? Broadway import Sutton Foster had to be seen to be believed, as she led the cast in the title number – if the show had stopped there, I’d have felt I’d had my money’s worth. Robert Lindsay, Gary Wilmot and Felicity Kendal were all terrific, but it was Sutton Foster who brought the audience to their feet. This show was subsequently streamed to cinemas and broadcast on tv. It returns to the stage again this year – the best place to enjoy it – due to public demand.

Meanwhile, Mike managed to clock up another incredible 41 performances OnHisOwn; I joined him for 38 of those. You can read all about them on the OnOurOwn page. Under normal circumstances, we’d have offered more of these to you – have a look to see what you missed.

As the late and much-lamented Stephen Sondheim asked:

What will tomorrow bring?

The pundits query:

Will it be cheery?

Will it be sad?

Will it be birds in spring

Or hara-kiri?

Don’t worry, dearie,

Don’t worry, lad.

Although we already have 14 shows booked for 2022, I have my finger on the Pause button as regards making further arrangements for the Group, at least until the current rate of infection abates and our patrons are more prepared to commit themselves to returning to the theatre. “How will you know when that is, Fredo?” a friend asked. Well, perhaps  the readers of this report can advise me on that! Suggestions, please.

We are certainly booking shows which interest us, just for ourselves. I feel that the actors and directors and designers and technical crews deserve as well as need our support. It’s been heartbreaking to witness darkened theatres, but as thrilling as always to be part of a live audience. A theatre person was quoted this week as saying it may take five years for theatre to recover and return to the ‘old normal’ again. We are not prepared to wait and are enjoying the ‘new normal’ whenever we can.

Our thanks to Cook’s Coaches for their continued good service, and to Compass travel for their support as well. To all the box-office staff who have helped us make our bookings over the years, I miss you! On-line booking and e-tickets just aren’t as good.

As always, but this year more than ever, Mike and I are grateful to those of you who joined us loyally on our 10 visits – we had no mask-debaters or vax-deniers to deal with, and I hope that everyone felt perfectly safe in our company. We look forward to seeing you again throughout 2022.

As Cole Porter said: You’re the Top!



Mandatory Mask wearing

Currently three theatres have announced they are making mask-wearing mandatory in their buildings, in both foyer and auditorium – The National Theatre, The Royal Opera House, and the Donmar Warehouse. This pleases us. Other theatres will follow. We have been asking our Group to wear masks and be fully vaccinated before joining us on the coach, and already this is a requirement of most theatres, except when you’re eating or drinking. We have noticed that the majority of theatre audiences (not our Group!) have been reluctant to put on their masks. We regard this as selfish and foolish. But times they are a-changing. In recent days there has been more compliance. As a precaution, for everyone’s continuing safety and for the future of live theatre, PLEASE wear a mask and bring your vaccination certificate to the theatre. This will be mandatory for all our future theatre visits

29/11/21 Fredo writes

Q&A for Life of Pi

Mike and I were invited to a preview of the new production of Life of Pi, adapted from the award-winning book by Yann Martel. 

As soon as we entered the Royal Circle, we noticed that the stage had been reconfigured to extend into the stalls, like the prow of a boat. I went to investigate, and I was joined by another man who was admiring the beauty of one of London’s loveliest theatres (Wyndham’s). I pointed out that the first four rows of the stalls had been reshaped, and that in fact some rows had been removed altogether.

I’ve heard it’s very spectacular,” I said. “It is,” he  confirmed. “I saw it two years ago in Sheffield.””But you’re not from Sheffield?””No,” he said, “I’m Canadian. I wrote the book it’s based on!”

pi-book pi film pi play yann

I would have liked to spend more time with the amiable Mr Martel; after all, how many Booker Prize winners do I run into every day? The show was about to begin (and what a show it was!).

We all got to know Yann Martel a little better when  he was joined on stage after the performance, by director Max Webster and Lolita Chakrabarti, who wrote the script. Max, who is also an Associate Director of the Donmar Warehouse, started the discussion by asking Yann and Lolita how they had spent lockdown. Lolita had been surprisingly busy: she’d been filming the television series Vigil before lockdown, and then filming was closed down for 5 months. When it was resumed, with all the Covid protocols in place, all the actors were fatter and had to have their costumes let out. She had also worked on her play Hymn, which was streamed by the Almeida, starring her husband Adrian Lester.

Yann, on the other hand, hadn’t noticed much difference in his life. He lives in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, “where nothing happens anyway” and the children went to school and he got on with writing his next book. At this point he apologised if he wasn’t making much sense: he’d been up since 3.00am, as he was staying with his in-laws. At 3.00am, he was wakened  by the screams of his 9-months-pregnant sister-in-law, and her labour was fast, as she gave birth in the bath some hours afterwards!

What had suggested the story for Life of Pi? The movie was dominated by the scenes of Pi in a boat with a Tiger called Richard Parker, but the book and the play contain more exposition. In the character of Pi, three religions – Hindu, Muslim and Catholicism – are fused, and the crux of the plot is what we choose to believe. Yann explained that he is not a fan of organised religion, and that Canada is a very secular society. However, as a young man, he backpacked his way round Iran and India, and was impressed by the magical thinking that he observed. He became more interested in this, and wrote the book as an expression of his thoughts. He admitted that there isn’t much of a plot – there’s a boy in a  boat with a tiger, and that’s it. He didn’t expect it to be noticed; at best, he thought it might be a cult classic, and he was taken by surprise by the book’s immense success.

Lolita read the book soon after it was published in 2002, and loved it. She was intrigued by the description of the family’s zoo, and by the development of the story. Adapting it posed several problems, as she realised that she had to sacrifice certain episodes which simply would not work on stage. She was also aware that she was adapting it during the Trump/Johnson era, and the references in the book to the distrust of government became more pertinent.

Did Yann have a writing process? Oh no, he just wrote the book – but then he realised that in fact, he had had a process for this venture. He’d spent several months researching the factual details that he wanted to include at McGill University – things like tigers can drink salt water, turtles have 10 different kinds of meat. Because of the magical elements in the book, he had to made sure that the essential facts were correct.

He then wrote notes for each chapter, which he stored in envelopes, along with other envelopes containing thoughts on various themes in the book. This acted as his plan, and allowed him to structure his story.

Lolita laughed, as she had dome exactly the opposite. She had highlighted different parts of the book  and made notes to hold the themes together in her adaptation. “You deconstructed it!” exclaimed Yann.

Had Lolita simply provided the dialogue as a basis for the production team to work on? She didn’t exactly bristle at this question, but she stated very firmly that she wrote the play thoroughly, and presented a finished script to the director, designer and visual effects artists.

Max asked Yann how he, as a writer used to working on his own, had found being involved with a large collaborative team on the play? Yann didn’t seem to mind. as there had been a small-scale production in Bradford, and a possibly illegal one in Cornwall, and he had enjoyed his evening in this beautiful theatre very much. He relished the way the actors were so close to the audience, and from his seat in the Royal Circle, it had worked splendidly (except for one detail, which he didn’t like, but declined say what).

It was a fascinating end to  a terrifically theatrical evening, though perhaps in the interview, Max Webster wasn’t given his due as director. Life of Director?

29/10/21 Fredo writes

Q&A at the Donmar

We enjoyed the performance of LOVE AND OTHER ACTS OF VIOLENCE at the Donmar, and we were grateful to have the actors tell us about their experience of working on this challenging new play in a very technical production.

The Donmar’s Director of Development, Silvia Melchior, asked the three actors what they thought when they were first presented with the script. Richard Katz, who makes a late entrance into the action, laughed and admitted that he did what all actors do; he’d leafed through it to see how many lines his character had. He said he then read it, looking for excuses not to do it, but the quality of the writing was so obvious that he couldn’t find a good reason to say No.

Abigail Weinstock, making her professional debut in this play, told us that as she graduated into the Coronavirus lockdown, she wasn’t in a position to be picky, and so she thought it was the best play she’d ever read!  The versatile Tom Mothersdale whose exuberant performance had animated much of the play, seemed rather shy in interview. He owned up to not having understood the play initially, but knew that it was saying something that no other play was saying – which seems to be that love between individuals combats violent external forces, and at times, one overcomes the other.

Because the play ends with a flashback to an earlier conflict, Silvia asked the actors if they had done much research. Abigail said that she had done the usual drama school exercise of researching the character’s job (she plays a physicist), and visited museums and read books on stars  and space, but she realised that this was pointless. In rehearsals, they learned about the history  of Lemberg, and the pogrom there, and had discussions with historians and rabbis galore.

Richard said the he was currently reading East West Street, the award-winning history by human rights lawyer Phillippe Sands.  And as he was playing a carpenter, he read books about trees. But, he emphasised, this was like preparing for the theory part of the driving test; sooner or later you have to stand up and say the words to the other actors, and at that point, research is not the most important thing. He added that the writer Cordelia Lynn was very strict about the actors respecting her text, and wouldn’t let them alter a word, not even to make it funny (and perhaps this play could benefit from a few laughs).

The first part of the play is punctuated with blackouts, following which we find the characters at a different stage in their relationship – and in a different area of the stage. Director Elayce Ismail had mapped out each scene for the actors, but Tom said they still got confused, and had to guide each other into position. Although the physical movements were carefully choreographed by the fight director, Abigail apologised to Tom for having punched him that evening, and assured him it wouldn’t happen again.

The play ends movingly with a prayer in Yiddish. This, said Abigail, is a travellers’ prayer. It’s a fitting end to the journey undertaken by the actors and the audience.

29/09/21 Fredo writes –

Donmar & Drury Lane relaunched

Walking down Earlham St last week, I had a strange sensation. We were going to the relaunch of the Donmar Warehouse, a familiar and much-loved destination for many years. When it opened 30 years ago,it was the smallest auditorium in the West End, allowing audiences to sit no more than four rows away from the greatest talents in the acting world. Why was I experiencing a Norma Desmond moment: “I don’t know why I’m frightened. I know my way around here.”

It was because the Donmar had taken advantage of the hiatus during the last 18 months to conduct a remodelling. Had the atmosphere been lost in the remodelling? Had the intimacy evaporated?  Would it be like seeing an old friend after they’d had work done (and it hadn’t worked)?

First impressions count, and we were immediately struck by the size of the foyer. Where had all that space come from? The bar and box-office combined (and how is that going to work, I wonder?) are at the rear, on the left side, allowing better access to the lift.

The revelation is the first floor. The walls that closed the bar from the stalls foyer have been removed. The bar is against the back wall, and there is an amazing amount of space for patrons to move around much more freely. I’m not sure if the decoration wasn’t complete, or if they’re going for the “distressed” look, but it looked and felt good. I’d never noticed before that the ceilings are very, very high.

We checked out the toilets, always an important consideration. One has urinals and one booth; the other has 5 or 6 booths only, but both are signed as unisex. I locked horns briefly with a member of the board on this subject,  and let her know that I think they made the wrong decision.

The upper floor replicates the Stalls level. Again, it’s much more spacious, and the crowds will move around more freely.

What about the theatre itself? Thankfully, not much has changed. The stalls still surround the stage on three sides, and the seats have been reupholstered (praise the Lord!) I was convinced that the back row at least had been raised, but I was assured not – maybe it was just the extra layer of foam in the seats. The stage remains as large as ever; because it’s a small theatre, it gives the impression of having a small stage, but it actually has the same footprint as the stage at Wyndham’s Theatre.

The Executive Director Henny Finch welcomed the supporters and explained the work that had been carried out. She assured us that the lift had been fixed, and wouldn’t break down; the air-conditioning had  been fixed, and wouldn’t break down, and that all the electrics had been renewed – and of course wouldn’t break down! Adam Kenwright, the Chairman of the Board, thanked us all for our support, and then Michael Longhurst beamed in from New York (he’s currently rehearsing Caroline, or Change at Broadway’s Studio 54, with Sharon D Carke reprising her Olivier award-winning performance) to tell all how amazing it has been.

The performance poet Inua Ellams read three of his poems, and then we had time to explore the new Donmar again. How did I feel? As if we never said Goodbye!

As audiences are returning to straight plays more slowly than we would wish, we haven’t made a group booking for the Donmar’s re-opening production, Love & Other Acts of Violence. However, go to our Bookings page to read about the production following that, and book now!

We also had a look round the public areas of the Theatre Royal Drury Lane. If the Donmar had had millions of pounds spent on it, Andrew Lloyd Webber has splurged tens of millions on this, London’s oldest theatre, and it shows. The lobby is now a  thing of beauty, with elegant marble columns leading  to the Rotunda bar, where statues and busts of Shakespeare, Jonson, Sheridan and Balfe (no, not many people know Michael William Balfe; he was an Irish composer who wrote The Bohemian Girl). The side foyers have huge oil paintings depicting scenes from Shakespeare’s plays, and as you mount the stairs, there is a frieze celebrating Ivor Novello. On the walls on this side, there are scenes from My Fair Lady in grisaille, and you can recognise Julie Andrews and Rex Harrison.

We crossed the Circle foyer, and persuaded one of the attendants to let us peep into the bar, and wave at the statue of Noel Coward on the terrace overlooking Catherine Street.

Descending the staircase on the other side of the theatre, there is a frieze dedicated to Rodgers & Hammerstein,whose Oklahoma!, Carousel, South Pacific and The King and I  all played here. On the walls, again in grisaille, scenes from Show Boat. How exciting to think of the shows that received their premieres here! None of them ran as long as the first production of  Miss Saigon, which holds the house record of over 4,000 performances.

The splendour doesn’t stop there. At the side of the foyer, we found the Cecil Beaton Room, dedicated to the designer of My Fair Lady and decorated in 30’s elegance, and black and white. This room spills out into a courtyard cafe where I shall arrange to meet friends I want to impress in the future.

You too can explore all the public areas of the theatre, every day except matinee days, or you can book a guided tour which takes you into the auditorium and the Royal Boxes – there are two: The King’s Box and the Prince’s Box. George lll and his son, the future George lV, came to blows in the theatre’s foyer, and it was decided to create separate entrances for them to keep them apart.

Two theatres, two old friends, emerging from the wreckage with renewed vigour. Join us and become part of the revitalisation of London’s theatre district. They want to welcome you back – and so do Mike and I.

01cd6050-6a31-4218-b140-93f3bb86544a
16448081-14a0-4daf-8022-a9e33568975a

IMG_3460
IMG_3457

IMG_3461
IMG_3467

IMG_3476
IMG_3472

16/08/21 Mike writes –

What Covid regulations?

(Special theatre-themed masks from the National Theatre shop.)

This is the questions many of us are asking as we contemplate theatre-going again. The government has removed all legal requirements and asked us to follow our Common Sense. The one thing we all know about Common Sense is it’s not common to all. London Transport along with most shops and theatres ask us to wear masks. However, theatres do not (as yet) have a common policy. It is left up to the producers or the theatre management to decide what regulations to request. They no longer have to provide socially distanced seating. For your information, as an example, the regulations issued by Delfont Mackintosh Theatres can be found at this LINK. You will see that proof of double-vaccination (or alternatives) is suggested so I expect that covers all of us.

In our experience, taking of temperatures is being dropped, masks seem to be worn by the majority but not all of the audience, and spaced seating varies from theatre to theatre as does checking on audience compliance. A variety of other audience controls are being tried by different theatres. It all depends on you/us/them!

Some shows have had to be temporarily cancelled because a member of the cast or crew has been pinged, sent into quarantine, and their colleagues tested. Thankfully, as of today (16/08/21), this ridiculous requirement has been dropped. In future, a ping will only require testing and no show should be cancelled for that reason.

Most of the big shows are now opening with a potential capacity audience. Normality is returning and certainly we ourselves feel we are being very well looked after by theatre staff. Andrew Lloyd Webber has quite rightly been particularly critical of the way the government has treated the theatre during the pandemic, and he has been a perfect example of going to extreme sanitising lengths to keep his audiences safe.

We hope you are all looking forward to returning to theatre-going normality as much as we are. Our experiences so far since theatres reopened have given us no reason to doubt our enthusiasm.

27/07/21

Life, love and the multiverse

Our friend Jennifer took her first trip back to a West End theatre last week for a Donmar West End production. Here she gives you an idea of what the experience was like –

“Although we’ve missed the theatre during the pandemic, many of us have felt anxious about returning to a crowded auditorium to see a show.  As covid restrictions relax, directors and producers are doing their best to tempt us back.  Michael Longhurst, the Donmar’s Artistic Director, is staging an inventive revival of Nick Payne’s play Constellations  at the Vaudeville.  Michael directed the 2012 production of this two-hander, with Rafe Spall and Sally Hawkins, which group members might have seen.  In 2021, the casts comprise four couples, two of which rehearse simultaneously, so that, if one cast member becomes ill or tests positive, the other couple can step in and the show will go on.

So, on a sweltering Thursday evening during the recent heatwave, I made my way to the Strand to enter a theatre for the first time in a long time. There was the same buzz amongst the theatre goers waiting outside that I remember from the before times.  The necessary admin, a bag check, covid app check-in and electronic ticket check, was all overseen by helpful and cheerful staff.  Inside the theatre, the air conditioning was very welcome as was the isolated seating plan.  There was even a QR code on the back of the seat in front through which you could order a drink using your smartphone so no need to stand at the bar. 

And the play?  It was a delight.  I was lucky enough to see Sheila Atim and Ivanno Jeremiah as Marianne the cosmologist and Roland the beekeeper.  Sheila lit up the stage in Girl from the North Country in 2017 and did so again here, in a very different part.  Ivanno was a quieter foil to Sheila’s star wattage but has moments, including when he reads his poem about bees, that made me catch my breath.  The play follows the stages in the couple’s relationship from its beginning to the very sad end (bring a hankie) through multiple permutations or multiverses (Marianne explains the cosmic theory early on).  The scene changes and time shifts are handled with aplomb, aided by clever lighting and sound.  At the start, I tried to keep a tab on which time line was being updated but soon realised it didn’t matter.   The play is about life, love, the universe and everything in between and should be enjoyed in the moment.  I’m very glad I finally got to see it, despite the pandemic”. 

constellations-1-1 constellations2

12/07/21

Football chaos in the West End

(© Cameron Mackintosh Limited)

During the disruption in the West End after the Euros Final on Sunday 11 July, a crowd climbed onto the balcony of Wyndhams Theatre causing much damage. 

Cameron Mackintosh has written to the Prime Minister saying –

 “Around 50 people broke through fencing at Wyndham’s Theatre and climbed on to the delicate canopy of this 19th century, grade II* listed building in the heart of the West End…the police appeared insufficiently resourced to deal with this vandalism and the danger posed to trespassers, and it was only later that riot police finally arrived.

Significant damage was inflicted on the theatre, with repairs estimated in the tens of thousands, and the incident could easily have resulted in serious injury or fatality.

Why was the West End subjected to chaos with seemingly little to no crowd management or police protection on what was obviously always going to be a highly-charged and exceptionally emotional day for the whole nation?

(This is) a grim metaphor for the way in which government has treated commercial theatre since March 2020. Time and again, and in stark contrast to other industries and the multi-million dollar US federal aid grants awarded to help re-open Broadway theatres and productions, we have simply been left to fend for ourselves…met with impediment in our urgent plea for help to solve the crippling uncertainty caused by unworkable isolation rules and unobtainable insurance.”

We couldn’t agree more and hope the damage can be repaired before the theatre reopens with Leopoldstadt later this month.

Football and Tennis v Theatre at the Bridge

Our friend Elizabeth made her first post-lockdown visit to the theatre on a Wimbledon / Euros match day to see Bach and Sons at the Bridge Theatre. She wrote to tell us about it –

“Once I was outside the theatre, having taken in the huge presence that was the Euros – it was the day of the England vs Denmark game –  it felt fine to be at the Bridge again.  

Waiting to go in, I watched Wimbledon on one big screen on the green and a rock group on another, while children tried to score goals and Qatar Airlines tried to sell tickets, not to mention a number of ‘outlets’ selling hamburgers and chips.  The Bridge seemed in a dignified way to be waiting for these intruders to have their moments and then move on. The downstairs Ladies’ loos were unisex which explained the man I encountered.  Bridge staff lovely.  It was apparent many oldies were returning to the theatre for the first time in months. My seat was in splendid isolation.  I couldn’t reach to touch anyone in any direction. 

I enjoyed the play, Bach and Sons by Nina Raine.  It isn’t on anything like the scale of Amadeus.  It felt more of a chamber piece at times.  Oh, the problems of fathers and sons and the legacy of having a brilliant father!  For non musical types like me there was a lot of helpful explanation about counterpoint and other technical stuff which at times felt a bit laboured.  I learnt a lot about Bach (I knew nothing) and sympathised with his constantly pregnant wives and the heart-breaking loss of so many children.  But the script at times felt a bit clunky.   The cast were good and of course I am a big fan of Simon Russell Beale, so it was great to see him, but that afternoon some of the witty lines failed to land. Was that down to the audience?  Not entirely I think, though once or twice I could only hear myself chuckling.  I loved the set.  Both the actors playing the elder sons were very good and I think we may have had the understudy for son Carl.  I should say though that play has some really lovely moments and the music sounds wonderful.  And, unlike one of the critics I read, I was moved at the end and discovered that my facemask mops up tears and saves them stinging your cheeks as they fall. 

I was very happy to have seen the play. The performance was very well received and SRB was greeted with thunderous applause.  I listened for audience members’ comments as we left and many were very enthused. 

I had a good afternoon, managing to avoid the already drinking Ingerland fans draped in flags near the station on my return. I have never been much of a matinee girl and this afternoon out sort of reinforced my feelings.”


22/5/21 Fredo writes –

CURTAIN UP!

For too long, it looked like Curtains for London’s theatre. After years of theatre-going, after watching the standard of production and acting getting better and better, with Highlights such as Matthew Bourne’s Swan Lake, War Horse, Follies, Company, Present Laughter with Andrew Scott, Betrayal with Tom Hiddleston – oh, the list could go on and on – it all suddenly ground to a halt under grim circumstances.

Now theatres are opening their doors again, and Mike and I have booked to see a number of shows OnOurOwn. Are you ready to join us in helping Theatreland recover from the body-blow it’s been dealt?

We’ve sold out two visits to Andrew Lloyd Webber’s new musical Cinderella, and reinstated three visits each to Pretty Woman and The Drifters Girl, and we’re looking forward to To Kill a Mockingbird (but that’s not till next year). A date for 4000 Miles is still to be announced.

We are currently offering you tickets for a Matthew Bourne show (and The Mirror and the Light) – see the Bookings page of this website.

There are interesting new shows that will be booking in the near future. We’d like to hear from you – what would you like to see? When are you prepared to make your theatre comeback? Do let us know. Please email us at fredo-donnelly@theatreguys.co.uk or fredoandmike@theatreguys.co.uk.

Here’s a sample of what’s on offer – but please note that we can’t guarantee we’ll be able to get tickets for all or any of these (bookings may be heavy or there may be no group discount):

Frozen  – Disney’s most popular musical comes to the stage at Drury Lane, directed by Michael Grandage.

Back to the Future the musical-powered DeLorean zooms into the Adelphi.

Into the Woods – to find the thing that makes it worth the journeying! – but not until next year, at the Old Vic.

Camp Siegfried Olivier Award winner Patsy Ferran and rising star Luke Thallon meet in a summer camp for teenagers in America in the 1930s. They don’t know that the camp has a sinister agenda.

Spring Awakening – more teenagers come to terms with growing up in oppressive 19th century Germany in this startling musical revival.

Macbeth James McArdle and Saoirse Ronan take the leads. It’s at the Almeida. It won’t be easy to get tickets.

The Mirrow and the Light – the final part of Hillary Mantel‘s Wolf Hall trilogy with Ben Miles and Nathaniel Parker.

Cabaret Eddie Redmayne and Jessie Buckley star. It’s at the Kit Kat Klub, seating a mere 550. Where? We haven’t been told yet. If you want tickets, be prepared to dig deep in your pockets.

The Normal Heart – there are rumours Ben Daniels will be in this at the National Theatre.

The Mirror and the Light, the final part of Hillary Mantel‘s Wolf Hall trilogy, again with Ben Miles and Nathaniel

We hope that we can offer you some of the above – and more! Please tell us what you think you may like to see. And we look forward to spending time with you back in the theatre. The future of Fredo’s Theatre Group depends on YOUR support.

patsie ferran luke thallon james mcardle soairse ronan ben miles eddie redmayne jessie buckley ben daniels

Patsy Ferran; Luke Thallon; James McArdle; Saoirse Ronan; Ben Miles with Hilary Mantel; Eddie Redmayne; Jessie Buckley; Ben Daniels.

20/02/21 Mike writes

The Arts v. Brexit

Here’s a news item I spotted in the Times this week:

Visa Problems Stop National Theatre Tour

The National Theatre has ditched plans to tour Europe this year because of difficulties in obtaining visas for performers. The company had been planning to stage a production of its award winning show The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, but announced yesterday that complications arising from the Brexit deal had meant the tour had become too costly. A spokeswoman for the National Theatre told BBC News: “The potential additional costs for visas and current lack of clarity around social security contributions as a result of the Brexit deal means regrettably it is currently not financially viable.” Earlier this week Caroline Dinenage, a culture minister, admitted to MPs that the Brexit deal had caused an “absolute crisis” in the performance industry. Museums, actors and crew members now need a visa to work in the EU. A government spokesman said the pandemic meant that theatres could not at present tour in Europe and that it was co-operating with the industry. (George Grylls)

This brief news appeared in the Times this week, following a report on the Culture Select Committee meeting with Arts representatives to discuss the effects of the Brexit deal on the Arts. Yawn not! 

We watched the meeting on the BBC Parliament Channel, and it was three hours of riveting if appalling viewing. It was reassuring to find that ALL members of the Select Committee from ALL political parties were critical of the government’s mishandling of Brexit problems for the Arts. The minister confirmed the chaos.

The Arts received the equivalent of ‘a No Deal’ from Brexit, leaving all those involved with theatre and the other arts to fend for themselves in a new minefield of expensive red-tape over work-permits and visas. The UK suggested a solution but the EU rejected it. The EU suggested a solution but the UK rejected it. Stalemate! No further action!

Government Departments involved in negotiations are not talking to each other and are hindering any progress. An official review of Brexit problems is not expected for another five years, too late for many Arts jobs and organisations to survive. This is despite the Arts bringing in £111 billion of taxable revenue annually, far in excess of the much talked about Fisheries!

The NT tours mentioned above are just the early signs of trouble – the eternally touring War Horse is another NT casualty. Even if Covid restrictions permitted, the Brexit ‘no deal for the Arts’ would currently hinder or forbid any reciprocal working arrangements between the UK and the EU. It used to be easy – now it’s not. 

If you thought a NT tour in the EU would not affect theatre-going here, think again. Foreign tours bring much needed cash to the NT and, without funding, the performances we enjoy will cost more, or not happen at all. Music, opera, ballet, theatre – all performers and crew in all the Arts are affected.

Brexit is already damaging not just the Arts in this country, but affecting the performances we all like to see. Think about it and tell your MP – the Arts are in danger.

06/01/21 Fredo writes –

Where Is The Life That Late We Led?

“But there’s nothing to say!” I protested, when Mike suggested that I write the Annual Report on the Theatreguys activities for the past year.

“Yes, there is,” Mike insisted. “We did lots on our own – well, a bit – and we did 13 visits with the group.”

13 visits? But in other years we’ve done nearly 60! And I only remember 11…oh, yes, that’s because I started 2020 in hospital, and had to ask John Carr to break into my flat and find the tickets and the precious folder with all the details, and he and his wife Judith and Sue Webster kindly sorted out the first two trips because both Mike and I were very unwell….

Yes, it was a grim start to a year that grew progressively more uncertain. At least we were ill at the start and not the end of the year, and we made a full recovery. We didn’t realise how grim it was going to become for some.

And in that brief period of possibilities, BC, we found some gems:

Matthew Bourne’s The Red Shoes
Dances at a Gathering
The Cellist
A Christmas Carol

There were two visits to The Red Shoes, which like all of Matthew Bourne’s productions gets better and better each time he brings them back. At the Royal Opera House, Jerome Robbins’ Dances at a Gathering was exquisite, with Cathy Marston’s The Cellist completing the double bill with the extraordinary dancer Marcelino Sambe convincing as the musical instrument. That was a memorial evening (partly for reasons I’m trying to forget!)

I’d chosen the final performance of Onegin as the title role was to be danced by Thiago Soares, without realising that this was to be his final appearance with the Royal Ballet. The ovation that he deservedly received at the end was exciting, and we all felt privileged to be part of such a special occasion.

Why had I resisted taking a group to see A Christmas Carol at the Old Vic for so many years? Finally, my friend Tom at the box-office wore my resistance down, and we took our seats – and mince pies – at a matinee, with hoards of children. It was amazing. My favourite moment? When Patterson Joseph as Scrooge jumped off the stage and shook hands with a little girl in a seat nearby – her eyes lit up with the transforming magic of theatre!

Mike and I had enjoyed the press launch of The Prince of Egypt, but the show itself was let down by a weak book (and I don’t mean the Good Book). The 11th Commandment: Thou shalt not try to turn a Disney cartoon into a live show without rewriting the dialogue.

The new staging of Les Misérables sounded interesting, and we had two visits to check it out. Yes, it worked, and perhaps looks more appropriately like 19thcentury engravings than it did in its previous incarnation. I was very pleased when Mrs S phoned me to say that she’d enjoyed it so much she booked to take her grand-daughter to see it, and found that without the group reduction, the tickets cost £30 more than she’d paid to come with us!

The Welkin
The Visit
Teenage Dick

The National Theatre weighed in with two heavyweight dramas: The Welkin looked handsome, but no-one would have minded if it had been considerably shorter, even with Maxine Peake leading a strong female cast. The Visit, also at the National, was an equally long evening.This was a personal triumph for Lesley Manville (now DBE) but the production left me with the impression that there was a better play on paper than we’d just seen on stage. The Donmar bravely staged Teenage Dick, a resetting of Richard lll in an American high school with Daniel Monk , an actor whose physical disabilities didn’t prevent him giving a startling portrayal. Sadly this didn’t appeal to many of our group.

Leopoldstradt

Although our theatre-going was then cruelly cut short, I have a strong feeling that we had seen the Best New Play of 2020 in Tom Stoppard’s Leopoldstadt. This was story-telling on a grand-scale, with a large cast doubling roles as generation succeeded generation. The always reliable Adrian Scarborough shone here in the playwright’s most emotional play. It needed to be seen twice: first, to get an overview of the historical sweep of the play, and then to savour the detail packed into it. Sadly, the opportunity was lost.

Abruptly, we got notice that our revels were now ended. I was particularly disappointed that we didn’t get to see the revival of City of Angels, with one of the best casts ever assembled for a musical in the West End – Rosalie Craig, Hadley Fraser, Vanessa Williams, Rob Houchen had to pack their bags and found themselves suddenly unemployed.

Instead of happy evenings sitting in the dark enjoying some of the finest talent in the land, I spent many hours writing cards to accompany cheques for refunds for most of the shows we’d booked- about 600 to date. At the time of writing, we’re still optimistic about seeing Pretty Woman, 4000 Miles, To Kill a Mockingbird and The Drifters Girl, eventually. I’m grateful to everyone for their patience and understanding.

What does the future hold for the theatre? Several producers made abortive efforts to reopen before Christmas, and invested heavily in protective equipment. Mike and I visited 3 theatre and two cabaret venues, and felt reassured that all precautions had been taken (and we lived to tell the tale). Now it looks as though the reopening may still be a little while in the future, and our worries for the artists and backstage and front-of-house staff continue. Their existence is precarious at the best of times, and as many are on temporary or zero-hour contracts, the furlough scheme hasn’t covered them.

We’re grateful to all our theatre friends who have kept in touch with us. We’ve missed you very much, and we hope that old acquaintance will be renewed before long. As the saying goes, the shows must go on!

(Click to next page below)